兩個公司談合併? 母公司vs子公司還差不多.
2025/05/21 03:26
瀏覽207
迴響1
推薦15
引用0
Lai Qingde claimed the other day that the unification of both sides of the strait is like an acquisition of a company against another one; therefore, it necessitates an equitable talk to settle the deals. Obviously, Lai implied that both sides are different entities that are not affiliated with one another. Thus, they are two independent companies.
Taiwan is like a subsidiary to a mother company, Mainland China, and the latter could do anything it prefers, including cutting off any relation between them.
限會員,要發表迴響,請先登入
迴響(1) :
- 1樓. 雁~《詩詞習作輯錄》2025/05/22 12:47兩個公司談合併?音涉及主權爭議,這比喻似不太恰當。母公司vs子公司?Retiredbum格主說法也不正確。若以母公司vs子公司喻兩岸,則中華民國才是母公司吧。兩岸關係很複雜,政治爭執非你我尋常百姓能置喙。和則共榮,戰則俱枯;這天理淺易,兩岸領導人焉不知?今俄羅斯多人突鼓動中國立馬五統?背後算盤可議。除藉停戰氛圍掠奪烏土外,圖促兩岸啟釁裂解趁火打劫!I do wish 潮平两岸闊,風正一帆懸。But DPP and Lai are seeking independence, while KMT seeking status quo forever, so, how can we have a peace across the strait? BTW, the Republic of China must belong to Chinese people, but does any politician in Taiwan dare recognize himself or herself as Chinese in the public? Retiredbum 於 2025/05/22 16:01回覆