膽固醇 Cholesterol ~ 多多益善 ? !
2016/04/28 18:33
瀏覽1,487
迴響6
推薦24
引用0
楔子: 美國政府修改了40年以來的錯誤：膽固醇有益無害﹐不再分好壞 http://myytaoli.blogspot.com/2016/04/40.html
杞人憂天﹐美國政府農業部﹐所言 無異於『狼來了』﹐謊言嚇人﹐喊了 40年﹐圖利 Big Drug ? !
当年 某庸医 推 Pfizer 製的 膽固醇药 Lipitor，小老朽吃了﹐ 半夜 脚抽筋，立馬拒吃。
有些 药廠 急功近利，推銷新藥 有如 月亮﹐初一十五不一樣﹐除了 Liptor﹐小老朽 药櫃 (Medicine Cabnet)﹐ 另有一款 糖尿病 药 Avandia﹐現在也听医生說﹐不宜吃了。 
病從口入﹐吃(药 ~ 毒药?) 当慎 ~ 摸著石子過河？！ http://classic-blog.udn.com/mbr8879576/8712138
世上 不乏 似是实非 事務 http://classic-blog.udn.com/mbr8879576/53767319
建議 多 http://classic-blog.udn.com/mbr8879576/241884 
懇請不吝賜教？
Devil in Disguise - Elvis Presley
Committee Drops Cholesterol From Dietary Guidelines
你可能會有興趣的文章：
限會員,要發表迴響,請先登入
迴響（6） ：
6樓. 摸 象 或 (不?) 著 木目2019/07/12 16:50LDL-C極低 → 出血性中風風險最高
https://health.udn.com/health/story/6008/3924620
https://n.neurology.org/content/early/2019/07/02/WNL.0000000000007853
「壞膽固醇」（低密度脂蛋白膽固醇LDL-C）水平和出血性中風風險呈U型關聯。 出血性中風風險最高的人群是LDL-C極低組，其次是LDL-C極高組。
懇請不吝賜教？-
5樓. 摸 象 或 (不?) 著 木目2018/03/21 04:04Dr. Eric Berg
The Truth About Cholesterol - and LDL and HDL
懇請不吝賜教？ 
4樓. 天涯孤鴻···花窗2016/05/09 22:03治病？還是害命？
電視上光看好多藥物的反應，就夠嚇死人了！！所言甚是 !
凡药三分毒 ? ! 摸 象 或 (不?) 著 木目 於 2016/05/09 22:59回覆降低膽固醇的Statins其實有副作用？ https://health.udn.com/health/story/6012/6587807 (Ten Drugs ~ Thomas Hager)
Statins最常見的副作用如下：
◆ 肌肉疼痛與無力
◆ 糖尿病
◆ 記憶喪失與認知問題
罕見卻嚴重得多的副作用則包括：
◆ 橫紋肌溶解症（嚴重的肌肉損壞，可能導致腎衰竭）
◆ 肝臟損傷
◆ 帕金森氏症
◆ 失智症
◆ 癌症 摸 象 或 (不?) 著 木目 於 2022/09/05 22:01回覆
3樓. MS2016/04/30 00:06cholesterol’s function.
Our livers produce cholesterol and will reduce its production when we consume foods with cholesterol. Thus, in normal condition our body should have a balance of cholesterol to properly function as follow:
1). Low Density Cholesterol (LDL) to bind fate and carry them in our blood steam and transport the fate to all part of our body. We have bad name for fate but it’s required for our survival. We also have a bad name for LDL- “Bad Cholesterol”. But imagine we don’t have LDL then we would all die. 2). High Density Cholesterol (HDL)- This is the cholesterol picking up those fates drop in our blood steam by LDLs when them transport those fate for our body. They theory is that we don’t want too much fate dropping in our blood steam to clog blood vessels. LDL fate binding is not perfect thus we have HDL acting as cleaner.
Thus there is no so called good or bad cholesterol. And what is properly level of HDL and LDL also become an issue debatable. Once this ratio, namely, (LDL+HDL +some part of Trigylcerides)/ HDL was widely use to gauge whether we going to have problem or not. But I don’t see this number showing up on blood test Lipitor panel report anymore. Maybe this is also a part of new thinking.
By the way you mention taken Lipitor from Merck. I believe Lipitor (atorvastatin) is made by Pfizer. Side effect like cram is quite often when take so call “statin” medicine.
Hope this will not confuse you more.Thanks ....
听說 Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), ubiquinol, ubiquinone 可 消除 腿抽筋 ? ! 摸 象 或 (不?) 著 木目 於 2016/04/30 00:14回覆-
2樓. 謝春 MD 腎臟﹐內科2016/04/29 19:49理解錯了
這是一般人理解錯了
：新指南只是說從食從物中攝取的膽固醇對血液的膽固醇水平影響不大。
高膽固醇血症仍然是心血管病的危險因素。有心腦血管病危險的人，仍需降血膽固醇。
差之毫釐，謬以千里。
請不要相信，傳播錯誤觀念。哦 ? !
世上常有完全相反的理論, 都對. 例如, 妳說往東, 他說往西, 豈不是180度 完全相反, 可都能到美國 (殊途同歸, 條條大路通羅馬). 哈, 地球是圓的 ?
『東西, 非東西, 是名東西』 http://blog.udn.com/mbr8879576/267010 item 23 摸 象 或 (不?) 著 木目 於 2016/04/29 19:56回覆 
1樓. Reed2016/04/29 00:17吃 / 不吃 → Seems make no difference ?
世上常有完全相反的理論, 都對. 例如, 妳說往東, 他說往西, 豈不是180度 完全相反, 可都能到美國 (殊途同歸, 條條大路通羅馬). 哈, 地球是圓的 ? 『東西, 非東西, 是名東西』. http://blog.udn.com/mbr8879576/267010 摸 象 或 (不?) 著 木目 於 2016/04/29 20:02回覆https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/325567.php
Victoria Zigmont and team examined the health records of 4,683 men and women who were diabetes-free at the start of the study but were at risk of heart disease. Of the total number of participants, 16% — or 755 people — were taking prescription statins at the start of the study, in 2011. The study ended in 2014. The analysis revealed that people who took statins were more than twice as likely to receive a diabetes diagnosis than those who did not take the medication. Additionally, people who took statins for longer than 2 years were more than three times as likely to develop diabetes.
『持續服用史他汀的人比起沒有服用的人，得到糖尿病的機率高出一倍。服用史他汀超過兩年者，得到糖尿病的機率是沒有服藥者的三倍。這樣的結果讓研究人員認為，服用史他汀與患糖尿病之間是有關連性的。』 摸 象 或 (不?) 著 木目 於 2019/07/01 09:35回覆
