Introduction – Company Background

GuangXin Industrial Co., Ltd. is a specialized manufacturer dedicated to the development and production of high-quality insoles.

With a strong foundation in material science and footwear ergonomics, we serve as a trusted partner for global brands seeking reliable insole solutions that combine comfort, functionality, and design.

With years of experience in insole production and OEM/ODM services, GuangXin has successfully supported a wide range of clients across various industries—including sportswear, health & wellness, orthopedic care, and daily footwear.

From initial prototyping to mass production, we provide comprehensive support tailored to each client’s market and application needs.

At GuangXin, we are committed to quality, innovation, and sustainable development. Every insole we produce reflects our dedication to precision craftsmanship, forward-thinking design, and ESG-driven practices.

By integrating eco-friendly materials, clean production processes, and responsible sourcing, we help our partners meet both market demand and environmental goals.

Core Strengths in Insole Manufacturing

At GuangXin Industrial, our core strength lies in our deep expertise and versatility in insole and pillow manufacturing. We specialize in working with a wide range of materials, including PU (polyurethane), natural latex, and advanced graphene composites, to develop insoles and pillows that meet diverse performance, comfort, and health-support needs.

Whether it's cushioning, support, breathability, or antibacterial function, we tailor material selection to the exact requirements of each project-whether for foot wellness or ergonomic sleep products.

We provide end-to-end manufacturing capabilities under one roof—covering every stage from material sourcing and foaming, to precision molding, lamination, cutting, sewing, and strict quality control. This full-process control not only ensures product consistency and durability, but also allows for faster lead times and better customization flexibility.

With our flexible production capacity, we accommodate both small batch custom orders and high-volume mass production with equal efficiency. Whether you're a startup launching your first insole or pillow line, or a global brand scaling up to meet market demand, GuangXin is equipped to deliver reliable OEM/ODM solutions that grow with your business.

Customization & OEM/ODM Flexibility

GuangXin offers exceptional flexibility in customization and OEM/ODM services, empowering our partners to create insole products that truly align with their brand identity and target market. We develop insoles tailored to specific foot shapes, end-user needs, and regional market preferences, ensuring optimal fit and functionality.

Our team supports comprehensive branding solutions, including logo printing, custom packaging, and product integration support for marketing campaigns. Whether you're launching a new product line or upgrading an existing one, we help your vision come to life with attention to detail and consistent brand presentation.

With fast prototyping services and efficient lead times, GuangXin helps reduce your time-to-market and respond quickly to evolving trends or seasonal demands. From concept to final production, we offer agile support that keeps you ahead of the competition.

Quality Assurance & Certifications

Quality is at the heart of everything we do. GuangXin implements a rigorous quality control system at every stage of production—ensuring that each insole meets the highest standards of consistency, comfort, and durability.

We provide a variety of in-house and third-party testing options, including antibacterial performance, odor control, durability testing, and eco-safety verification, to meet the specific needs of our clients and markets.

Our products are fully compliant with international safety and environmental standards, such as REACH, RoHS, and other applicable export regulations. This ensures seamless entry into global markets while supporting your ESG and product safety commitments.

ESG-Oriented Sustainable Production

At GuangXin Industrial, we are committed to integrating ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) values into every step of our manufacturing process. We actively pursue eco-conscious practices by utilizing eco-friendly materials and adopting low-carbon production methods to reduce environmental impact.

To support circular economy goals, we offer recycled and upcycled material options, including innovative applications such as recycled glass and repurposed LCD panel glass. These materials are processed using advanced techniques to retain performance while reducing waste—contributing to a more sustainable supply chain.

We also work closely with our partners to support their ESG compliance and sustainability reporting needs, providing documentation, traceability, and material data upon request. Whether you're aiming to meet corporate sustainability targets or align with global green regulations, GuangXin is your trusted manufacturing ally in building a better, greener future.

Let’s Build Your Next Insole Success Together

Looking for a reliable insole manufacturing partner that understands customization, quality, and flexibility? GuangXin Industrial Co., Ltd. specializes in high-performance insole production, offering tailored solutions for brands across the globe. Whether you're launching a new insole collection or expanding your existing product line, we provide OEM/ODM services built around your unique design and performance goals.

From small-batch custom orders to full-scale mass production, our flexible insole manufacturing capabilities adapt to your business needs. With expertise in PU, latex, and graphene insole materials, we turn ideas into functional, comfortable, and market-ready insoles that deliver value.

Contact us today to discuss your next insole project. Let GuangXin help you create custom insoles that stand out, perform better, and reflect your brand’s commitment to comfort, quality, and sustainability.

🔗 Learn more or get in touch:
🌐 Website: https://www.deryou-tw.com/
📧 Email: shela.a9119@msa.hinet.net
📘 Facebook: facebook.com/deryou.tw
📷 Instagram: instagram.com/deryou.tw

Private label insole and pillow OEM Thailand

Are you looking for a trusted and experienced manufacturing partner that can bring your comfort-focused product ideas to life? GuangXin Industrial Co., Ltd. is your ideal OEM/ODM supplier, specializing in insole production, pillow manufacturing, and advanced graphene product design.

With decades of experience in insole OEM/ODM, we provide full-service manufacturing—from PU and latex to cutting-edge graphene-infused insoles—customized to meet your performance, support, and breathability requirements. Our production process is vertically integrated, covering everything from material sourcing and foaming to molding, cutting, and strict quality control.ODM pillow factory in Taiwan

Beyond insoles, GuangXin also offers pillow OEM/ODM services with a focus on ergonomic comfort and functional innovation. Whether you need memory foam, latex, or smart material integration for neck and sleep support, we deliver tailor-made solutions that reflect your brand’s values.

We are especially proud to lead the way in ESG-driven insole development. Through the use of recycled materials—such as repurposed LCD glass—and low-carbon production processes, we help our partners meet sustainability goals without compromising product quality. Our ESG insole solutions are designed not only for comfort but also for compliance with global environmental standards.Eco-friendly pillow OEM manufacturer Indonesia

At GuangXin, we don’t just manufacture products—we create long-term value for your brand. Whether you're developing your first product line or scaling up globally, our flexible production capabilities and collaborative approach will help you go further, faster.Indonesia pillow OEM manufacturer

📩 Contact us today to learn how our insole OEM, pillow ODM, and graphene product design services can elevate your product offering—while aligning with the sustainability expectations of modern consumers.Taiwan graphene product OEM factory

Digitally reconstructed skull and endocast of an Australian hobby falcon (Falco longipennis). Credit: Aubrey Keirnan (Flinders University) Researchers have developed a method to study bird brains by creating digital endocasts from empty cranial spaces in bird skeletons. Using this technique, they discovered that physical brain tissues closely match these digital imprints, allowing detailed studies of brain size and structure across 136 bird species. Historical Bird Skulls Inform Modern Science Understanding what birds ‘think’ while they fly is a challenge, but scientists from Australia and Canada are gaining fascinating new insights by studying the structure of their brains. Evolutionary biologists from Flinders University in South Australia and neuroscience researchers from the University of Lethbridge in Canada have joined forces to develop a groundbreaking method for reconstructing the brain structures of both living and extinct birds. They achieve this by creating digital ‘endocasts’—3D models of the space inside a bird’s skull where the brain once resided. Published in Biology Letters, the study—led by the ‘Bones and Diversity Lab’ at Flinders and the Iwaniuk Lab at the University of Lethbridge—reveals that even the dry skulls of long-dead birds can offer remarkable insights into brain structure. These include details about the size of key brain regions responsible for intelligence and coordination. This discovery was made by comparing historical microscopic brain sections with digital endocasts, in what is the largest study of its kind, analyzing 136 bird species. Digitally reconstructed skull and endocast of a Collared Sparrowhawk (Accipiter cirrocephalus; left) and the brain of a Cooper’s hawk (Astur cooperii; right) showing the similarities between endocasts and brains of two related species. Credit: CC-BY Aubrey Keirnan (skull) Andrew Iwaniuk (brain) Technological Advances in Bird Brain Research “This showed that the two correspond so closely that there is no need for the actual brain to estimate a bird’s brain proportions,” says the lead author, Flinders University PhD Aubrey Keirnan. “While ‘bird brain’ is often used as an insult, the brains of birds are so large that they are practically a braincase with a beak. We decided to test if this also means that the brain’s imprint on the skull reflects the proportions of two crucial parts of the actual brain.” Joined by researchers at the Department of Neuroscience at the University of Lethbridge in Alberta, Canada, the team scanned the skulls of 136 bird species for which they also had microscopic brain sections or literature data. This allowed them to determine if the volume of two crucial brain parts, the forebrain, and the cerebellum, corresponds with the surface areas of the endocasts. The extremely tight match between the ‘real’ and the ‘digital’ brain volumes surprised the researchers. Timelapse of PhD student Aubrey Keirnan mounting a serially sectioned bird brain onto slides so that they can be measured and analyzed under a microscope at the Iwaniuk lab in Canada. Credit: Aubrey Keirnan The Future of Neuroanatomy: Digital Insights into Extinct Species “We used computed microtomography to scan the bird skulls. This allows us to digitally fill the brain cavity to get the brain’s imprint, also called an ‘endocast’,” says senior co-author Associate Professor Vera Weisbecker, from Flinders University’s College of Science and Engineering. “The correlations are nearly 1:1, which we did not expect. But this is excellent news because it allows us to gather insight into the neuroanatomy of elusive, rare, and even extinct species without ever even seeing their brains.” Associate Professor Vera Weisbecker says that advanced digital technologies are providing ever-improving access to some of the oldest puzzles in animal diversity. “The great thing about digital endocasts is that they are non-destructive. In the old days, people needed to pour liquid latex into a brain case, wait for it to set, and then break the skull to get the endocast. “Using non-destructive scanning not only allows us to create endocasts from the rarest of birds, it also produces digital files of the skulls and endocasts that can be shared with scientists and the public.” A masked lapwing (Vanellus miles) and its reflection in the water. Credit: CC-BY Michael Jury of Mykelphotography With an extensive background in bird brain research, University of Lethbridge Professor Andrew Iwaniuk, who co-led this study with Associate Professor Weisbecker, says he did not expect such a clear correlation between brain tissue and endocasts. “While most of the telencephalon (outer part of the forebrain) is visible from the outer surface, a substantial portion of the cerebellum is obscured by this region. Additionally, the avian cerebellum has ‘folds’ which are often obstructed by a large blood vessel called the occipital sinus,” says Professor Iwaniuk. “Given that the degree of obscurity can vary between species, I did not expect a strong correlation between endocast surface area and brain volume across all species.” The closest living relatives of birds, crocodillian skeletons photographed at the Gallery of Palaeontology and Comparative Anatomy, Paris. Credit: Aubrey Keirnan (Flinders University) Professor Iwaniuk adds that the study provides support for existing research by other scientists – including for critically endangered modern birds or perhaps even species gone extinct. However, the team says that it remains to be seen how well the data can be applied to dinosaurs, which are the birds’ closest extinct relatives. “For example, crocodiles are the closest living relatives of birds, but their brains look nothing like that of a bird – and their brains do not fill the braincase enough to be as informative,” adds Ms. Keirnan. Reference: “Avian telencephalon and cerebellum volumes can be accurately estimated from digital brain endocasts” by Aubrey R. Keirnan, Felipe Cunha, Sara Citron, Gavin Prideaux, Andrew N. Iwaniuk and Vera Weisbecker, 1 January 2025, Biology Letters. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0596

A new study used a unique approach based on chromosome structure to determine that comb jellies, also known as ctenophores, were the first lineage to diverge from the animal tree of life, with sponges following as the next branch. Previously, it was unclear whether sponges or comb jellies were the first branch due to inconclusive gene sequence studies.  This research contributes to our understanding of early animal evolution and offers insight into the origin of key features of animal biology such as the nervous system, muscles, and the digestive tract. Chromosome analysis resolves debate about sister group of all animals. It’s comb jellies, not sponges. Researchers used a novel chromosome-based approach to reveal that comb jellies were the first lineage to diverge from the animal tree of life, preceding sponges. This research, providing new insights into early animal evolution, refines our understanding of how key biological features evolved. For more than a century, biologists have wondered what the earliest animals were like when they first arose in the ancient oceans over half a billion years ago. Searching among today’s most primitive-looking animals for the earliest branch of the animal tree of life, scientists gradually narrowed the possibilities down to two groups: sponges, which spend their entire adult lives in one spot, filtering food from seawater; and comb jellies, voracious predators that oar their way through the world’s oceans in search of food. In a new study published this week in the journal Nature, researchers use a novel approach based on chromosome structure to come up with a definitive answer: Comb jellies, or ctenophores (teen’-a-fores), were the first lineage to branch off from the animal tree. Sponges were next, followed by the diversification of all other animals, including the lineage leading to humans. Although the researchers determined that the ctenophore lineage branched off before sponges, both groups of animals have continued to evolve from their common ancestor. Nevertheless, evolutionary biologists believe that these groups still share characteristics with the earliest animals, and that studying these early branches of the animal tree of life can shed light on how animals arose and evolved to the diversity of species we see around us today. Hormiphora californensis, called the California sea gooseberry, is a comb jelly, or ctenophore, common in California coastal waters. Ctenophores have eight sets of cilia running down their side, which they use to propel themselves through the oceans in search of food. This specimen was observed on 2016 by MBARI’s remotely operated vehicle (ROV) Doc Ricketts in the Monterey Canyon at a depth of approximately 280 meters. Credit: Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute “The most recent common ancestor of all animals probably lived 600 or 700 million years ago. It’s hard to know what they were like because they were soft-bodied animals and didn’t leave a direct fossil record. But we can use comparisons across living animals to learn about our common ancestors,” said Daniel Rokhsar, University of California, Berkeley professor of molecular and cell biology and co-corresponding author of the paper along with Darrin Schultz and Oleg Simakov of the University of Vienna. “It’s exciting — we’re looking back deep in time where we have no hope of getting fossils, but by comparing genomes, we’re learning things about these very early ancestors.” Understanding the relationships among animal lineages will help scientists understand how key features of animal biology, such as the nervous system, muscles and digestive tract, evolved over time, the researchers say. “We developed a new way to take one of the deepest glimpses possible into the origins of animal life,” said Schultz, the lead author and a former UC Santa Cruz graduate student and researcher at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute (MBARI) who is now a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Vienna. “This finding will lay the foundation for the scientific community to begin to develop a better understanding of how animals have evolved.” A newly discovered and still undescribed bioluminescent deep-sea sponge observed in 2019 by MBARI’s ROV Doc Ricketts offshore of Central California at a depth of approximately 3,970 meters. Credit: Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute What’s an Animal? Most familiar animals, including worms, flies, mollusks, sea stars, and vertebrates — and including humans — have a head with a centralized brain, a gut running from mouth to anus, muscles and other shared features that had already evolved by the time of the famed “Cambrian Explosion” around 500 million years ago. Together, these animals are called bilaterians. Other bona fide animals, however, such as jellyfish, sea anemones, sponges, and ctenophores, have simpler body plans. These creatures lack many bilaterian features — for example, they lack a defined brain and may not even have a nervous system or muscles — but still share the hallmarks of animal life, notably the development of multicellular bodies from a fertilized egg. The evolutionary relationships among these diverse creatures — specifically, the order in which each of the lineages branched off from the main trunk of the animal tree of life — has been controversial. With the rise of DNA sequencing, biologists were able to compare the sequences of genes shared by animals to construct a family tree that illustrates how animals and their genes evolved over time since the earliest animals arose in the Precambrian Period. But these phylogenetic methods based on gene sequences failed to resolve the controversy over whether sponges or comb jellies were the earliest branch of the animal tree, in part because of the deep antiquity of their divergence, Rokhsar said. “The results of sophisticated sequence-based studies were basically split,” he said. “Some researchers did well-designed analyses and found that sponges branched first. Others did equally complex and justifiable studies and got ctenophores. There hasn’t really been any convergence to a definitive answer.” Just looking at them, sponges seem quite primitive. After their free-swimming larval stage, they settle down and generally remain in one place, gently sweeping water through their pores to capture small food particles dissolved in sea water. They have no nerves or muscles, though their hard parts make nice scrubbers in the bath. “Traditionally, sponges have been widely considered to be the earliest surviving branch of the animal tree, because sponges don’t have a nervous system, they don’t have muscles, and they look a little bit like colonial versions of some unicellular protozoans,” Rokhsar said. “And so, it was a nice story: First came the unicellular protozoans, and then sponge-like multicellular consortia of such cells evolved and became the ancestor of all of today’s animal diversity. In this scenario, the sponge lineage preserves many features of the animal ancestor on the branch leading to all other animals, including us. Specializations evolved that led to neurons, nerves and muscles and guts and all those things that we know and love as the defining features of the rest of animal life. Sponges appear to be primitive, since they lack those features.” The other candidate for earliest animal lineage is the group of comb jellies, popular animals in many aquariums. While they look superficially like jellyfish — they often have a bell-like shape, although with two lobes, unlike jellyfish, and usually tentacles — they are only distantly related. And while jellyfish squirt their way through the water, ctenophores propel themselves with eight rows of beating cilia arranged down their sides like combs. Along the California coast, a common ctenophore is the 1-inch-diameter sea gooseberry. Chromosomes to the Rescue To learn whether sponges or ctenophores were the earliest branch of animals, the new study relied on an unlikely feature: the organization of genes into chromosomes. Each species has a characteristic chromosome number — humans have 23 pairs — and a characteristic distribution of genes along chromosomes. Rokhsar, Simakov, and collaborators had previously shown that the chromosomes of sponges, jellyfish and many other invertebrates carry similar sets of genes, despite more than half a billion years of independent evolution. This discovery suggested that chromosomes of many animals evolve slowly, and allowed the team to computationally reconstruct the chromosomes of the common ancestor of these diverse animals. But the chromosome structure of ctenophores was unknown until 2021, when Schultz — then a graduate student at UC Santa Cruz — and his co-advisers, Richard Green of UCSC and Steven Haddock of MBARI and UCSC, determined the chromosome structure of the ctenophore Hormiphora californiensis. It looked very different from those of other animals, which posed a puzzle, Rokhsar said. “At first, we couldn’t tell if ctenophore chromosomes were different from those of other animals simply because they’d just changed a lot over hundreds of millions of years,” Rokhsar explained. “Alternatively, they could be different because they branched off first, before all other animal lineages appeared. We needed to figure it out.” The researchers joined forces to sequence the genomes of another comb jelly and sponge, as well as three single-celled creatures that are outside the animal lineage: a choanoflagellate, a filasterean amoeba and a fish parasite called an ichthyosporean. Rough genome sequences of these non-animals already existed, but they did not contain the critical information needed for chromosome-scale gene linkage: where they sit on the chromosome. A Smoking Gun Remarkably, when the team compared the chromosomes of these diverse animals and non-animals, they found that ctenophores and non-animals shared particular gene-chromosome combinations, while the chromosomes of sponges and other animals were rearranged in a distinctly different manner. “That was the smoking gun — we found a handful of rearrangements shared by sponges and non-ctenophore animals. In contrast, ctenophores resembled the non-animals. The simplest explanation is that ctenophores branched off before the rearrangements occurred,” he said. “The fingerprints of this ancient evolutionary event are still present in the genomes of animals hundreds of millions of years later,” Schultz said. “This research … gives us context for understanding what makes animals animals. This work will help us understand the basic functions we all share, like how they sense their surroundings, how they eat and how they move.” Rokhsar emphasized that the team’s conclusions are robustly based on five sets of gene-chromosome combinations. “We found a relic of a very ancient chromosomal signal,” he said. “It took some statistical detective work to convince ourselves that this really is a clear signal and not just random noise, because we’re dealing with relatively small groups of genes and perhaps a billion years of divergence between the animals and non-animals. But the signal is there and strongly supports the ‘ctenophore-branched-first’ scenario. The only way the alternative sponge-first hypothesis could be true would be if multiple convergent rearrangements happened in both sponges and non-ctenophore animals, which is very unlikely.” For more on this research, see Genetic Linkages Illuminate Earliest Animal Evolution. Reference: “Ancient gene linkages support ctenophores as sister to other animals” by Darrin T. Schultz, Steven H. D. Haddock, Jessen V. Bredeson, Richard E. Green, Oleg Simakov and Daniel S. Rokhsar, 17 May 2023, Nature. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-05936-6 Jessen Bredeson of UC Berkeley also contributed to this work. Funding for this research was provided by the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, MBARI, the National Science Foundation (GRFP DGE 1339067 and DEB-1542679), the European Research Council’s Horizon 2020: European Union Research and Innovation Programme (grant No. 945026), internal funds of the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Molecular Genetics Unit, the Chan Zuckerberg Biohub Network and the Marthella Foskett Brown Chair in Biological Sciences.

Eight-year-old Jeje watches and learns about using a toolset from his mother Jire: a stone hammer and stone anvil used to crack nuts, Bossou, Guinea, West Africa. Credit: Tetsuro Matsuzawa Chimpanzees may refine cultural behaviors over time, with advanced toolsets spreading through migrating females, suggesting early stages of cumulative culture. Chimpanzees are renowned for their remarkable intelligence and ability to use tools, but could their cultures also evolve over time, similar to human cultures? A new multidisciplinary study, led by the University of Zurich, suggests that some of their most advanced behaviors may have been passed down and refined through generations. In recent decades, scientists have clearly demonstrated that chimpanzees, like humans, pass on complex cultures such as tool use from generation to generation. But human culture has become vastly more sophisticated, from the Stone Age to the Space Age, as new advances have been incorporated. Chimpanzee cultures haven’t changed in the same way, which suggests that only humans have the remarkable ability to build more sophisticated cultures over time. Scientists studying chimpanzees in the wild, however, have disputed this, suggesting that some of chimpanzees’ most complex technologies, in which they use multiple tools in sequence to extract hidden food sources, were probably built on previous knowledge over time. Tracing genetic links “As most chimpanzee tools, such as sticks and stems, are perishable, there are few records of their history to confirm this hypothesis – unlike human cases such as the evolution of the wheel or computer technology,” says lead author Cassandra Gunasekaram from the Department of Evolutionary Anthropology at the University of Zurich. Education by apprenticeship in chimpanzees: One-year-old Joya watches and learns about a using toolset from her mother Jire: a stone hammer and stone anvil used to crack nuts, Bossou, Guinea, West Africa. Credit: Tetsuro Matsuzawa For the new study, a team of anthropologists, primatologists, physicists, and geneticists from universities and research institutions in Zurich, St. Andrews, Barcelona, Cambridge, Konstanz, and Vienna joined forces to trace genetic links between chimpanzee populations over thousands of years, using new discoveries in genetics to uncover key pieces of chimpanzee cultural history in ways never before imagined. Early stages of cumulative culture The authors collected information on markers of genetic similarity – genetic evidence of links between different groups of chimpanzees – as well as a range of foraging behaviors previously reported to be culturally learned, from a total of 35 chimpanzee study sites across Africa. They grouped these behaviors into those that required no tools; those that required simple tools, such as using a leaf sponge to get water from a tree hole; and the most complex behaviors that relied on a toolset. Trading toolsets across generations “As an example of such a toolset, chimpanzees in the Congo region first use a strong stick to dig a deep tunnel through hard soil to reach an underground termite nest,” explains Gunasekaram. “Next, they make a ‘fishing’ probe by pulling a long plant stem through their teeth to form a brush-like tip, pressing it into a point, and deftly threading it down the tunnel they’ve made. They then pull it out and nibble off any defending termites that have bitten into it.” “We made the surprising discovery that it is the most complex chimpanzee technologies – the use of entire ‘toolsets’ – that are most strongly linked across now distant populations,” says corresponding author Andrea Migliano, professor of evolutionary anthropology at UZH. “This is exactly what would be predicted if these more advanced technologies were rarely invented and even less likely to be reinvented, and therefore more likely to have been transmitted between groups.” How female migrations spread innovation In chimpanzees, it is sexually maturing females, rather than males, who migrate to new communities to avoid inbreeding. In this way, genes are spread between neighboring groups and then further afield over the years, centuries, and millennia. The study authors discovered that it would be these same female migrations that could spread any new cultural advances to communities that lacked them. The study also showed that when both complex toolsets and their simpler versions (i.e., mostly the components of the toolsets) occur at different study sites, the genetic markers indicate that the sites were connected in the past by female migrations. This suggests that the complex versions were built cumulatively by adding to or modifying the simple ones. “These groundbreaking discoveries provide a new way to demonstrate that chimpanzees have a cumulative culture, albeit at an early stage of development,” Migliano adds. Reference: “Population connectivity shapes the distribution and complexity of chimpanzee cumulative culture” by Cassandra Gunasekaram, Federico Battiston, Onkar Sadekar, Cecilia Padilla-Iglesias, Maria A. van Noordwijk, Reinhard Furrer, Andrea Manica, Jaume Bertranpetit, Andrew Whiten, Carel P. van Schaik, Lucio Vinicius and Andrea Bamberg Migliano, 21 November 2024, Science. DOI: 10.1126/science.adk3381

DVDV1551RTWW78V