Mike dated Mon. Sept 24,2012 at 4:51 pm from Japan
Thanks for your reply
1.Dish closed a/c and credit back the money
2. Please disregard the Case #10208. 格主按: Base on above
sentence Judge took that I intended to ignore
the Summon (傳票) and gave order to pay 美金13萬9仟.
The fact that we moved to Japan Sept 1, 2012 and emailed the
reply on Sept 24,2012, the defendants. My family moved to Japan out
of Mariposa jurisdiction. I was suing Brian Rose 20 years ago(Tammy
told that he deceased already) for unpaid motel rent 3 months and
Mariposa Court could not find him and told me to drop the case and
case closed. The Case #10208 was suing me, owne of Muir Lodge
for broken leg of Tove Fox in Muir Lodge in May 20,2012. Apparently
it was a Case of Bad Actor.(unless concrete evidences could prove
otherwise,)I am living in Japan out of Mariposa Jurisdiction.
The case will be closed due to its nature
of civil matter .No one is given power of Attorney by me.
3. I have a refund from insurance company
and 1 from Google's Adsense. I do not have a home in the States and
could not buy 1 I will leave it as it is.
Thanks for the help.
Michael
( This email in dark brown color was the main cause to pay the plaintiff.
I was eligible in that jurisdiction & had to fly back to appear in CA
while residing in Japan?)
*****************************
Further I noticed followings: Anng Albert and Mike Barns
had brokenFederal Privacy law by opening my private mail
without my permission. Without opening my mail,
Mike Barns would not know that was a mail of SUMMON,
right? Judge would not side with Tove Fox with US$139,000 compensation.
That is my logic. It was all a set-up game!
Remark:
1. Both A&M had option either returning mail to sender or forwarding mail
without opening. Opening a private mail without permission is a crime against
Federal Privacy law.
2. I only authorized Mr. Ono and let him keep my key to PO
box #173 to forward private mails to Japan.
3. Compensate lost wages is in Federal labor law of withholding.
4.Individual mail remains private is in Federal Privacy law
5.Summon is deferent from subpoena Summon can be sent by
attorney while subpoena must be delivered by Court House.
6. Both types of documents usually compel mandatory appearance,
what about out of jurisdiction?and ignoring them can
have serious consequences (like mine cost $139,000).Living
in Japan, I have to obey Japanese law & I do not have dual
personality or bodies move around to answer both demands
7.A judge without knowing the term of jurisdiction is in question of
his eligibility 合格者,適任者.
限會員,要發表迴響,請先登入
- 2樓. 革命烈士韓起的兒子2015/04/21 10:26People does not have freedom of e-mail in the United of Stats, period
My abve e-mail was, to the best, a slip of tone and careless
e-mail. For that Judge ordered me to pay. People out there
you do not have freedom of e-mail in the United of Stats, period - 1樓. 革命烈士韓起的兒子2014/07/02 08:39違反隱私權又能怎樣?判刑?算了!
計算一下、官司不能夠再打、兩星期花錢uS$8,000
要是告下去、一年10幾萬以上、時間、金錢、精力,
還有黑法院在後面!違反隱私權又能怎樣?判刑?算了!










