ROC turned out to be a criminal lawsuit initiated by Taipei
DA against him on the ground of Anti-Universal Human
Right Art 22 & 23 DA. for his act of Abuse of power.
let's see Uncle Sam how to interprete it. Will it apply
case #10208 or I have to find other way to win the case?
The Instalment Note is the source of income monthly
Freezing my note would mean depriving my means of living
with exception of US$403 monthly from Social Security which
is not enough to pay monthly mortgage i.e.My daughter mansion
in Japan. I am seeking help from other sources. Mari, my wife,
I am asking Federal Superior Court of Fresno whether I can file
a lawsuit to revert the case untill final verdict. I do not
money to live on! Hey, Uncle Sam, I came to U.S with one M in
1990 and 22 years I had been working from hand to mouth.
I could not claim mine is one of American's dreams.)
has the right to social security and is entitled to realization,
through national effort and international co-operation and in
accordance with the organization and resources of each State,
of the economic,social and cultural rights indispensable for his
dignity and the free development of his personality.
- 第二十二条每个人,作为社会的一员,有权享受社会保障,
并有权享受他的个人尊严和人格的自由发展所必需的经济、 Article 23.社会和
文化方面各种权的实现,这种实现是通过国家努力和国际合作并依
照各国的组织和资源情况。 - (1) Everyone has the right to work, to free choice +
of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work
and to protection against unemployment. - (2) Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to
equal pay for equal work. - (3) Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable
remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an
existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented,
if necessary, by other means of social protection. - (4) Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions
for the protection of his interests.
第二十三条
㈠ 人人有权工作自由选择职业、享受公正和合适的工作条件并享受
免于失业的保障
㈡ 人人有同工同酬的权利,不受任何歧视。
㈢ 每一个工作的人,有权享受公正和合适的报酬,保证使他本和家
属有一个符合人的生活 条件,必要时并辅以其他方式的社会保障。 - ㈣ 人人有为维护其利益而组织和参加工会的权利。
( This drafted message is what my intention
will be if itconstitutes an email of improper nature.)
***************************************************************
蝴蝶城法院沒有裁判權?Michael Han and Mari Kitamori in ////////////////- Hamahcho, Hunabashi
Chiba, Japan Tel:81-XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Dated 27th of May,2014S -
To Superior Court of the State California In and for the County of Mariposa
|
Tove Fox, Plaintiff VS. Kitamori Emi Kitamori,Mari Kitamori and does 1~ inclusive, Defendants. |
No. :0010208 Follow up of Michael Han, self representing in this case, in support of motion to set aside default and default Judgement Date: Time: Ctrm: |
Your Honor, please review the attached evidences, case #10208 lacks
Mariposa Superior court jurisdiction. The reasons are:
1. Based on the grand deed of Muir Lodge Motel at time of incident ,it was a fact that
Muir Lodge Motel were owned by Han’s family. That is to say that:
A Han an alien ROC citizen owned 42.5% some time residing in Taiwan no fixed address.
B. Mari Kitamori , an alien Japanese wife owned 42.5% residing in Japan
C. Masahiko Kitamori, my son, an alien Japanese owned 7.5% residing In NY. U.S.A.
D. Emi Kitamori, my daughter an alien Japanese owned 7.5% residing in Japan
All 3 of them , alien owned 57.5% .
2. A.B..D members are now residing in foreign countries
3. Online Googling find the definition of jurisdiction: jurisdiction refers to the
inherent authority of a court to hear a case and to declare a judgment.
When a plaintiff seeks to initiate a suit, he or she must determine where
to file the complaint. The plaintiff must file suit in a court that has
jurisdiction over the case. If the court does not have jurisdiction,
the defendant may challenge the suit on that ground, and the suit may be
dismissed, or its result may be overturned in a subsequent action by one of the
parties in the case.”
4. Further the precedence of such case for your review:
The case of Matao “Eddie” Yokeno, an alien admitted to the United States for permanent
residence in Guam, vs. Emil Lai, a British overseas citizen, and Sawako Sekiguchi, a
Japanese citizen, should be removed from the District Court of Guam because it also
lacks jurisdiction. Lai and Sekiguchi live in Japan.
5.I, the defendant, challenge your right to declare the judgement for Plaintiff by ordering
money to give to Tove Fox on the ground of all aliens risiding in foreign countries.
6. Being defendant, we do have right to exame the evidence of plaintiffs clained injury.
On Feb 10th hearing it was improper not to let defendant, Mr. Han, to take a look
at evidences Tove Fox presented. It looked sounded fishy in this hearing $125,000
is not small amount for us to earn. We need tansparency of evidences to be examined.
7. The code: "A summon is served in the United States by ordinary mail but
Michael J.Villeggiante sent summon to Japan repeatedly.The Judge has
right to allow it. I believe that you have the power to decide what ever
you think it fits My presenting the above is for reference only
and wonder why not order all the legal forms being made
ready to American embassy so as to let foreignner access
easily. ! ( page 1)
8.The legal contention of this lawsuit is your holding view with evidence on Mike Barns
email “MIchael Han had intention to ignore the SUMMON”; while Mr. Han has been
fighting the fabricated case against Tove Fox’s lawsuit for broken leg with the intention
to get illegal compensation ($125,000 if it turn out to be real fabrication!)
9.This case #10208 even thought its a closed case.it needs to be overturned
by Federal district Court on accoiunt of lack jurisdiction.
After your order of restraining disposition dated April 1,,2014, the order was taken into
effect that I have no income to my bank A/C. Since I don’t have other income except
Pension US$403 which is not enough to pay my daughter’s home mortgage, I returned
to Japanese Home on May 19 2014 to live with my wife and daughter. That is my life
what it is and I will take it as it goes.
We have had family meeting. We decided that case #10208 must go on and let Federal
district court to decide the case. All we want is justice. We believe in the American judicial system.
We believe your wisdom. The righteousness will prevail.
This file is executed in Hunabashi our home dated June 1st , 2014 by
Michael Han
-------------------------------
Encl: Copies of famiy menber possport
Service lists:
|
To: The Presiding Judge Dana Walton Mariposa Superior Court P.O.Box 28 Mariposa CA 95338 U.S.A Daniel R. Weltin,Esp. Michael J. Villeggiante, Esp. Weltin,Street & Weltin,LLP 1432 Martin Luther King Jr. Way Oakland, CA 94612 U.S.A |
Court of Appeal in Fresno Fifth District Court of Appeal 2424 Ventura Street Fresno CA 93721 U.S.A.
American Consul city of Tokyo Embassy of the United States of America |
限會員,要發表迴響,請先登入











