.

RED STAR OVER THE PACIFIC.

本書描述美國海軍在太平洋被中國海軍擊敗

US NAVY FACE TO CHINA NAVY.RISING.

美國專家鼓吹「海權復興」抗衡中國

美國《福布斯》雙周刊網站20210406日發表題為《海權鼓吹者面對的問題是要有「什麼樣的海軍」》的文章，認為美國正在經歷一場關於「海權復興」的爆炸式的鼓吹。：有鑑於中國海軍日益強大美國海軍必須面對實際問題加速建造各式各樣的軍艦,以抵抗中國海軍在西太平洋區域,中國南海,印度洋,波斯灣等地區的活動.

(海權鼓吹者面對的問題是要有“什麼樣的海軍”》的文章，文章認為美國正在經歷一場關於“海權復興”的爆炸式鼓吹。文章還表示，“中國海軍是美國最重要的戰略挑戰，而海洋力量則一直是遏制中國的核心力量。”

“鼓吹者在鼓吹海權復興時沒有抓住要領，復興海權的關鍵不在於是否擁有一支全球性的海軍，而在於這支海軍應該呈現的樣式。”因此，建設怎樣一支海洋艦隊就成了困擾美國軍方的問題。

中國海軍的崛起，不僅提高了自主國防能力，還打破了美國在太平洋地區的海上霸主夢，讓美國等西方國家坐立不安。

 中國海軍實力增強，讓美國坐立不安近年來，中國海軍在現代化程度和規模上取得了長足的進步.....

美國鼓噪復興海權論，也就欺負小國，中國不僅存在美國海軍最強勢吃這套. 美國海軍分析家表示：“截至目前，美國海軍並沒有明確的攻擊潛在對手的勝利理念或作戰理念”。也就是說，美國海軍目前還沒有琢磨出一套戰勝對手的作戰方案或者作戰理念。

一個多世紀前，美國海軍上校馬漢指出‘海權論’，他認為海洋是國際發展的命脈，誰控制了海洋，誰就能稱霸全球”。馬漢主張美國應該建立能同時在大西洋和太平洋作戰的遠洋艦隊，事實證明，美國海軍採用了馬漢的構想，在二戰時建立了當時世界上規模最大、實力最強的海軍。

只如今風水輪流轉,物換星移國際局勢迅速改變,20世紀末葉自從蘇聯瓦解,世界上僅有美國海軍最強勢,21世紀伊始中國海軍強勢崛起,令美國海軍刮目相看,並且有後來居上超越美國海軍的意圖,因此美國再次提出“海權復興”，要求不再以高端的軍艦和飛機為主，而是轉向發展數量多、體積小的可部署平臺和無人機，以此來應對灰色地帶的行動和敏感地區的海上安全問題。這樣經過調整的艦隊就更具靈活性和機動性，在戰術方面給對手造成更多不確定性。

美國戰略專家評估,中國海軍積極擴張海外軍事基地,對於美國海軍而言就是某種程度的挑戰,換句話說中國海軍是否也就是說按照美國海軍上校馬漢指出.

‘海權論’，他認為海洋是國際發展的命脈，誰控制了海洋，誰就能稱霸全球.

Eagle vs Dragon: How the U.S. and Chinese Navies Stack Up.

本圖深藍色部份已經由中國海軍逐漸取得優勢地位挑戰美國海軍令美國懼怕?

The U.S. Navy is still not satisfied with sending warships across the coast of China all day long: it is difficult to defeat China in the backyard of China

According to recent reports in the US media, US naval research scholar Brian Clark published an article "The problem facing sea power advocates is "what kind of navy"", pointing out that an "explosive advocacy offensive" is taking place in the United States. Let Ma Hans "theory of sea power" revive a hundred years ago. These preaching seem strange at first. The U.S. Navy is undoubtedly still the most powerful sea power in the world, and it is stronger than the combined naval power of many countries in the lower rankings.

After all, the United States has a huge surface fleet with 11 nuclear-powered aircraft carriers as the core, and a huge underwater fleet composed entirely of nuclear-powered submarines. But Brian Clark believes that the U.S. Navy now needs to take on the task of “containing Chinese provocations” by sending warships into Chinas coastal waters almost every day, and “free navigation” on the islands and reefs that China claims to hold sovereignty. Passed in the Taiwan Strait to support the Taiwan authorities. These actions suppressed "Chinas provocation" into "grey area operations" that have always been below the combat leve.

But China is catching up at full speed, and the "sea power" that the U.S. Navy wants is to force China to even have no idea of ​​"catching up." Admiral Davidson, commander of the US Indo-Pacific Command, pointed out last month that Chinas military modernization will enable it to confidently implement conventional conflicts against the United States and its allies in the 2020s. The Chinese military, which is no longer confined to the gray area, may try to force the Taiwan authorities to accept "one China", completely seize the disputed islands from Japan, or consolidate its control of the South China Sea. The U.S. maritime service will remain vital to "deterring" Chinas military operations in its coastal waters.

But the question is what the U.S. Navy will deter and how to deter. For example, if China decides to “put all bets” on the Taiwan authorities desperately declaring "Taiwan independence" and invest all necessary forces to force the Taiwan authorities to submit, Americans must notice that Taiwan Island is only more than 100 kilometers away from the mainland. The continental United States reaches more than 6000 kilometers. The ultimate goal of optimizing the U.S. Navy is to "defeat the Chinese army in the Chinese backyard." This is currently very difficult to do. It will enable the U.S. Navy to become a large multi-purpose warship designed to survive and fight in a highly competitive environment. And the plane is tilted...