On TVBS, "李濤下台，施茂林呢？鄭文燦呢？"
2007/04/01 23:02
瀏覽768
迴響1
推薦3
引用0
2007-04-01 21:54 by fair My response to Mr. Wong's blog of CT.
I feel that this time Wong is fair in his commentary article
with regards to Mr. Lee of TVBS.
Chinese has saying: "Killing people is nothing but beheading
and let head falling to the ground."TVBS has taken its responsibility
and Mr. Lee has gone all the way to bow his head and apologize
to his negligence to the public. We are all human and make our mistakes.
Following are few things, I think in my humble opinion, going too far:
with regards to Mr. Lee of TVBS.
Chinese has saying: "Killing people is nothing but beheading
and let head falling to the ground."TVBS has taken its responsibility
and Mr. Lee has gone all the way to bow his head and apologize
to his negligence to the public. We are all human and make our mistakes.
Following are few things, I think in my humble opinion, going too far:
1. NCC has stepped out its line by ordering Lee of TVBS to resign
within 7 days.That is not stipulated by law. It should not take law
in its own hand, if we want a government functioned by rules of law.
2. All other media must take its objective view and must not add fuel
in its own hand, if we want a government functioned by rules of law.
2. All other media must take its objective view and must not add fuel
on the fire. You should know that neither one of the media are perfect
can not promise itself not make the same mistakes one day.
That is why most of American media after CBS Dan rather Case had tried
not to criticise CBS because they might make the mistakes.
3. Taiwan government official are trying to use the TVBS case to
shift people's attention and to cover up their own scandal which are more
serious than TVBS case.
can not promise itself not make the same mistakes one day.
That is why most of American media after CBS Dan rather Case had tried
not to criticise CBS because they might make the mistakes.
3. Taiwan government official are trying to use the TVBS case to
shift people's attention and to cover up their own scandal which are more
serious than TVBS case.
Let us calm down and take a look about CBS Dan Rather case.
Read the following news about similar case & its attitude.............
*Please know that nothing is more important to us than people's trust in our ability and our commitment to report fairly and truthfully.* That is the attitude with Dan Rather and Mr. Lee
of TVBS. 對TVBS「趕盡殺絕」?! I agree with Mr. Wong that in some extend that the public of Taiwan has gone too far.
Fall out of above:
Read the following news about similar case & its attitude.............
*Please know that nothing is more important to us than people's trust in our ability and our commitment to report fairly and truthfully.* That is the attitude with Dan Rather and Mr. Lee
of TVBS. 對TVBS「趕盡殺絕」?! I agree with Mr. Wong that in some extend that the public of Taiwan has gone too far.
Fall out of above:
to:Dr. T
quote your own words"reputation of an insititution is much
more important than person"
What about Taiwan, ROC? Isn't that an institution?
No one comes out to rebut that when I talked to
my American scholar and courthouse top engineer
with regard to Chen's scandal.
You've got to have a fair mind.
*****************************************
Ying said it well.
'媒體高層即便再怎麼施壓，可沒拿槍頂著你的頭，
逼你用不道德或違法的手段去跑新聞吧"
It is your choice of profession. You take the job and you
know the competition out there. When you made up the story
and ask some one else to shoulder for you, that is outragious.
I don't think any institution must be blaimed for individual
reporter's personal misconduct. Never heard any institution
being prosecuted except reporter. You may refuse to disclose
the source of information & it may end up you in jail.
..........................................................................
It goes with motive.
the following is borrowed from another blog quoting:
"史鎮康進一步表示，拍攝前他就請示過特派員，
獲得批准23日進行採訪，同時還要求要報警和報告總監史鎮康進一步表示..."
From DA,"史鎮康 took the initiative to direct the film and
asked top permission to go ahead with this production.
Would the TVBS know the details? After the publication,Lee
knew what was going on but it was too late.
If Lee directed "史鎮康" to create the film then Lee should
have been prosecuted.
It goes with motive and initiative.
In another words, evidence evidence and evidence.
Mr. 史鎮康 show your evidence either tape recording
with top or written statement. Otherwise,
史鎮康 you are done. Judgement is not decided by hearsay.
Following is digest from UDN editorial dated 4/3/07........
李濤下台，施茂林呢？鄭文燦呢？執政七年，民進黨還在疾呼「轉型正義」；但如果它看看自己手中失衡的天平，它還能告訴人民正義是什麼嗎？民營媒體因新聞失控受到嚴懲固是咎由自取，但施茂林、鄭文燦因政治動機濫用公權力至此地步，竟仍能獲得上級公然包庇，敢問蘇內閣：你的正義在哪裡？
quote your own words"reputation of an insititution is much
more important than person"
What about Taiwan, ROC? Isn't that an institution?
No one comes out to rebut that when I talked to
my American scholar and courthouse top engineer
with regard to Chen's scandal.
You've got to have a fair mind.
*****************************************
Ying said it well.
'媒體高層即便再怎麼施壓，可沒拿槍頂著你的頭，
逼你用不道德或違法的手段去跑新聞吧"
It is your choice of profession. You take the job and you
know the competition out there. When you made up the story
and ask some one else to shoulder for you, that is outragious.
I don't think any institution must be blaimed for individual
reporter's personal misconduct. Never heard any institution
being prosecuted except reporter. You may refuse to disclose
the source of information & it may end up you in jail.
..........................................................................
It goes with motive.
the following is borrowed from another blog quoting:
"史鎮康進一步表示，拍攝前他就請示過特派員，
獲得批准23日進行採訪，同時還要求要報警和報告總監史鎮康進一步表示..."
From DA,"史鎮康 took the initiative to direct the film and
asked top permission to go ahead with this production.
Would the TVBS know the details? After the publication,Lee
knew what was going on but it was too late.
If Lee directed "史鎮康" to create the film then Lee should
have been prosecuted.
It goes with motive and initiative.
In another words, evidence evidence and evidence.
Mr. 史鎮康 show your evidence either tape recording
with top or written statement. Otherwise,
史鎮康 you are done. Judgement is not decided by hearsay.
Following is digest from UDN editorial dated 4/3/07........
李濤下台，施茂林呢？鄭文燦呢？執政七年，民進黨還在疾呼「轉型正義」；但如果它看看自己手中失衡的天平，它還能告訴人民正義是什麼嗎？民營媒體因新聞失控受到嚴懲固是咎由自取，但施茂林、鄭文燦因政治動機濫用公權力至此地步，竟仍能獲得上級公然包庇，敢問蘇內閣：你的正義在哪裡？
你可能會有興趣的文章：
限會員,要發表迴響,請先登入
迴響（1） ：
1樓. 文武兩邊站, 可可疊羅漢2007/04/04 22:52標準
標準可以動態, 正義仍在旋轉. 意識當作王道, 十字路口蠻幹
