.

美國總統當選人川普運用名為「奧弗頓之窗」（Overton window）的理論框架準確評估美國利益，直指巴拿馬運河和格陵蘭問題是關鍵。前白宮首席策略長班農也稱,川普主張巴拿馬運河落入中國之手,而共產黨是世界舞台上的「惡意行為體」。

川普運用名為「奧弗頓之窗」的理論框架準確評估美國利益。

所謂「奧弗頓之窗」是有關一段時間內大多數人在政治上可接受的政策範圍的一種理論。奧弗頓之窗以其發現者，約瑟夫．奧弗頓命名。奧弗頓最早的想法是,一個政策的政治可行性主要取決於它是否在這個範圍內,而不是政客的個人偏好。奧弗頓認為這個窗口構成了政客在不走極端且考慮輿論情形下,可以推行的政策的大致範圍。

一些共和黨人，也支持川普言論。X 帳號「方舟子」說，德克薩斯的共和黨眾議員吉爾（Brandon Gill）稱,他認為巴拿馬人民,格陵蘭人民,加拿大人民都應該為川普希望將他們領土納入美國而高興。

..

德克薩斯州的共和黨眾議員羅尼.傑克遜.表示,支持川普併吞加拿大,格陵蘭,建立「大美利堅帝國」,版圖都畫好了,加拿大叫「北方殖民地」,格陵蘭叫「格陵蘭保護領地」。他說：「美國到了卡特時代才不被罵美帝國主義,川普要讓美國再次實行帝國主義,人們還以為他是要搞孤立主義呢。」

.

...

.

.

國際政治觀察家分析認為,美國與中國競爭是無法扼阻,中國強勢崛起經濟實力,直追美國,川普在前任總統之際時期,發動提高中國的關稅等一系列措施,但是似是而非的政策,並沒有影響到中國的發展,Covid-19.確是影響到全球的經濟發展,過去的8年2016-2024.美國的經濟衰退不振,依賴印刷美元鈔票及銷售美國國家債券渡日,除了像世界的弱小民族國家,強迫購買美國的國家債券,除此之外就是壓迫世界各國,大肆採購美國的軍火武器,甚至於將台灣的TSMC,遷移到美國設廠製造生產,尤其甚者是暗中發動俄烏戰爭,以圖符合美國的利益,如今川普再度當選美國總統,勢在必行要有成績表現,向選民有所交代,因此美國的國內經濟財政窘,困無法突破再創造經濟奇蹟,就是印刷美元現金鈔票再多也就是說於事無補,因此生為生意人的川普,的確有經商生財之道,將獵物投向海外發展,因此巴拿馬運河和格陵蘭,加拿大,自然成為美國人的獵物盤中餐,美國人追隨奇祖先英格魯薩克遜強盜,海盜的劣根性,就是對外以武力,實施掠奪,否則不得不派遣軍隊,奪取巴拿馬運河的管轄權(向中國挑戰)等等,一系列海盜行為,尤其是強欺弱,大欺小的叢林法則,美國人是澈底的說到做到..

.

航空母艦戰鬥群是無底洞的錢坑,需款孔急,否則只有停擺,成為破銅爛鐵等待被拆卸,美國也只有發動海外戰爭或是軍事演習,才能維持航空母艦的運作,這樣一來就瞭解到,為什麼美國海軍的航空母艦,不時的巡弋中國南海挑戰中國.

.

Trump’s threats to Greenland, Canada and Panama explain everything about America First.

.

Donald Trump’s imperialist designs on Greenland, Canada and Panama often sound like the ramblings of a real estate shark who equates foreign and trade policy to a hunt for new deals.

But there’s method in his expansionist mindset. Trump, in his unique way, is grappling with national security questions the US must face in a new world shaped by China’s rise, the inequalities of globalization, melting polar ice and great power instability.

His attitude also embodies the “America First” principle of using US strength to relentlessly pursue narrow national interests, even by coercing smaller, allied powers.

Trump’s musings about terminating the Panama Canal Treaty especially show the preoccupation of the new administration with the encroachment of foreign powers into the Western Hemisphere. This isn’t a new concern — it’s been a constant thread in American history, dating back to the Monroe Doctrine in the 1820s when European colonialists were the threat. The issue endured through the communist scares of the Cold War. Today’s usurpers are China, Russia and Iran.

Trump’s belief, meanwhile, that the United States should rule supreme in its own sphere of influence is also an important hint about how he might manage key global hotspots, including the war in Ukraine and potentially even Taiwan.

But his 21st century neocolonialism is a huge risk and appears certain to run headlong into international law. And Trump could compromise America’s power by trashing alliances built up over generations and alienating its friends.

Trump keeps military force on the table

Trump poured fuel on a tense world waiting with trepidation for his second term on Tuesday when a reporter asked him if he could rule out force to seize back the Panama Canal or to take over strategically important Greenland.

“I’m not going to commit to that, no,” Trump said at Mar-a-Lago. “It might be that you’ll have to do something.”

Canadians were relieved to learn that the president-elect won’t be sending the 82nd Airborne across the 49th parallel. He said he’d only use economic force to annex the proud sovereign democracy to the north and make it the 51st state.

As often with Trump, his threats came with a mixture of malice and mischief. And there was a characteristic element of farce as the president-elect’s son, Donald Jr., flew the family’s Boeing to Greenland, with a bobblehead of his father perched on the cockpit control panel. “Make Greenland Great Again!” the president-elect posted on his Truth Social network shortly before his son landed.

It’s unlikely Trump will get what he wants with Canada, Panama or Greenland. So his strategy might be aimed at getting better deals for the US — perhaps a discount for American vessels transiting the key waterway between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, greater American access to rare earth minerals in Greenland and sea routes revealed by melting polar ice, as well as a new trade deal with Canada that might advantage US manufacturers. Trump would be sure to portray any of these as a massive win only he could have achieved, even if they end up being rather cosmetic like his first-term US-Mexico-Canada pact.

But Trump’s threats flesh out one of his foreign policy rationales: that each country should aggressively pursue their goals unilaterally in a manner that will inevitably profit strong, rich nations like the United States..

川普幕後有高人指導運用「奧弗頓之窗」Overton window的理論實施對外擴張侵略.

.