





.這樣一來外洩流露出美國軍事機密文件,主要就是誘導俄羅斯作出錯誤的戰略判斷,也就是說反情報戰的老把戲,如此而已,因為美國與西方國家的情報員,經常玩弄雙面諜的情報遊戲戰,從中獲利..
美國國防部五角大廈20230407日證實,稍早又有新一批的機密文件被外流到社群媒體,內容詳細描述了美國在中東,中國等全球關鍵領域的國安佈局,這令五角大廈相當震驚,更為拜登政府內外交迫的困境蒙上一層陰影。
美國官員表示,目前已知機密外洩的規模多達100逾份文件,且內容涵蓋足以掀起巨大波瀾的極敏感資訊。一名高階情報官員甚至將該起洩密事件稱為「五眼聯盟的噩夢」。五眼聯盟是由盎格魯-撒克遜民族(Anglo-Saxons)國家美,英,澳,紐,加5國所組成的情報共享集團。.
New Batch of Classified Documents Appears on Social Media Sites.
Secret documents that appear to detail American national security secrets on Ukraine, the Middle East and China have surfaced online..WASHINGTON — A new batch of classified documents that appear to detail American national security secrets from Ukraine to the Middle East to China surfaced on social media sites on Friday, alarming the Pentagon and adding turmoil to a situation that seemed to have caught the Biden administration off guard.
The scale of the leak — analysts say more than 100 documents may have been obtained — along with the sensitivity of the documents themselves, could be hugely damaging, U.S. officials said. A senior intelligence official called the leak “a nightmare for the Five Eyes,” in a reference to the United States, Britain, Australia, New Zealand and Canada, the so-called Five Eyes nations that broadly share intelligence.
The latest documents were found on Twitter and other sites on Friday, a day after senior Biden administration officials said they were investigating a potential leak of classified Ukrainian war plans, include an alarming assessment of Ukraine’s faltering air defense capabilities. One slide, dated Feb. 23, is labeled “Secret/NoForn,” meaning it was not meant to be shared with foreign countries.
The Justice Department said it had opened an investigation into the leaks and was in communication with the Defense Department but declined to comment further.
Mick Mulroy, a former senior Pentagon official, said the leak of the classified documents represents “a significant breach in security” that could hinder Ukrainian military planning. “As many of these were pictures of documents, it appears that it was a deliberate leak done by someone that wished to damage the Ukraine, U.S., and NATO efforts,” he said.
One analyst described what has emerged so far as the “tip of the iceberg.”
Early Friday, senior national security officials dealing with the initial leak, which was first reported by The New York Times, said a new worry had arisen: Was that information the only intelligence that was leaked?.
.By Friday afternoon, they had their answer. Even as officials at the Pentagon and national security agencies were investigating the source of documents that had appeared on Twitter and on Telegram, another surfaced on 4chan, an anonymous, fringe message board. The 4chan document is a map that purports to show the status of the war in the eastern Ukrainian city of Bakhmut, the scene of a fierce, monthslong battle.
But the leaked documents appear to go well beyond highly classified material on Ukraine war plans. Security analysts who have reviewed the documents tumbling onto social media sites say the increasing trove also includes sensitive briefing slides on China, the Indo-Pacific military theater, the Middle East and terrorism...
.The Pentagon said in a statement on Thursday that the Defense Department was looking into the matter. On Friday, as the disclosures widened, department officials said they had nothing to add. But privately, officials in several national security agencies acknowledged both a rush to find the source of the leaks and a potential for what one official said could be a steady drip of classified information posted on sites.
The documents on Ukraine’s military appear as photographs of charts of anticipated weapons deliveries, troop and battalion strengths, and other plans. Pentagon officials acknowledge that they are legitimate Defense Department documents, but the copies appear to have been altered in certain parts from their original format. The modified versions, for example, overstate American estimates of Ukrainian war dead and underestimate estimates of Russian troops killed.
On Friday, Ukrainian officials and pro-war Russian bloggers suggested the leak was part of a disinformation effort by the other side, timed to influence Ukraine’s possible spring offensive to reclaim territory in the east and the south of the country.
A senior Ukrainian official said that the leak appeared to be a Russian ploy to discredit a counteroffensive. And the Russian bloggers warned against trusting any of the information, which one blogger said could be the work of “Western intelligence in order to mislead our command.”
Behind closed doors, chagrined national security officials were trying to find the culprit. One official said it was likely that the documents did not come from Ukrainian officials, because they did not have access to the specific plans, which bear the imprint of the offices of the Pentagon’s Joint Staff. A second official said that determining how the documents were leaked would start with identifying which officials had access to them.
The first tranche of documents appeared to have been posted in early March on Discord, a social media chat platform popular with video gamers, according to Aric Toler, an analyst at Bellingcat, the Dutch investigative site.
In Ukraine, Lt. Col. Yurii Bereza, a battalion commander with Ukraine’s National Guard whose forces have fought in the country’s east in recent months, shrugged off news of the leak.
He noted that information warfare had become so intense that “we can no longer determine where is the truth and where is the lie.”
“We are at that stage of the war when the information war is sometimes even more important than the direct physical clashes at the front,” Colonel Bereza said.
A soldier in his unit, Maksym, had yet to hear the news. “We have a lot of our own problems, and with this leak I have no words,” he said angrily.
Ukraine War Plans Leak Prompts Pentagon Investigation. Classified documents detailing secret American and NATO plans have appeared on Twitter and Telegram - NYT.
.
國際軍事戰略觀察家分析認為:由於烏克蘭戰爭勢所難免的失敗,美國自編,自導,自演的所謂烏克蘭戰爭計劃機密,被洩露外流? .
「圖片顯示的都是實體文件,看來這是有人蓄意洩密,想破壞烏克蘭,美國和北約的努力。」烏克蘭總統顧問(Mykhailo Podolyak)則在Telegram上表示,他認為俄羅斯是該起洩密事件的幕後黑手,且這些外流文件並不真實,「與烏克蘭的真實計劃無關」,更內涵「大量虛構訊息」。
以色列情報組織莫薩德研判,所謂洩露流失的文件是否屬實?
尚須調查清楚,熟識軍方情報作業的軍事情報員研判,美國國防部內部簡報計劃的"草案",經常沒有被完全銷毀,極容易發生所謂的軍事機密外洩的情況發生?.
這樣一來美國的國防部及參謀總部內部管制作業有所缺失?
因為這種奶油黃金色的簡報用紙(防水型),是用於作戰計劃室專用,參與人員可用MARK.筆於紙張上塗改,討論,修正,正式版本通過核定前必須保留對照.
美國國防部五角大樓戰情指揮中心及烏克蘭戰場指揮中心的牆壁及會議桌上張貼,以供軍方人員使用,這才是真實的版本,除此之外電子版本(電腦硬碟加密處理,由專機,專員,運送烏克蘭及NATO情報部門)經由軍方衛星聯線作業,透過大瑩幕的電腦顯示器及電子白版,顯示出戰場的實際狀況與戰爭計劃是否符合隨時修正處理˙
截至目前為止俄羅斯尚未發表任何評論有關美國軍事機密外洩事件的報導..
Proactive tactics, not reactive:Instead of reacting to obstacles, a war room gives banks the tools to be proactive, spotting issues or delays before they actually happen. This helps to win new customers, keep existing customers, and comply better with regulations in order to get ahead of the competition. Banks that can’t see the obstacles ahead will be slow to adapt, and many simply won’t survive.
By combining process intelligence with automation like robotic process automation (RPA), banks can shape the war room, and have the ability to predict problems plug gaps in advance and fend them off – for example by updating bots with corrective actions to fix a failing process. Without intelligent automation, banks can only be reactive, learning about problems when it’s already too late; and in the banking and FS sector, a mistake like that can be critical to survival.
As legacy banks begin to embrace the era of digital transformation to keep up with their fintech counterparts, they’re doing a lot more than cashing cheques and lending loans. But with more services and better service comes more complex processes, in the background and for customers. For many, every new obstacle feels like another battle. However, with the right technologies deployed in the right way, banks can do better business and go above and beyond for customers.
美國國防部5角大樓戰情指揮部WAR ROOM,顯示出裁是真正的軍事機密.
Enter the digital war room. Here, banks can get visibility into every single process in their business as they actually behave..
.

....
.
限會員,要發表迴響,請先登入












