.

US plan for destruction of Taiwan draws public outcry.?

美國已經將台灣壓榨乾淨無法再利用只有毀滅性的毀掉台灣

美國毀滅台灣.美國無法得到台灣所以毀滅台灣,不讓中國撿到便宜的物品.戰爭將摧毀台灣的一切猶如烏克蘭的翻版.

筆者並非危言聳聽,許多事件正在逐步發生應驗,台灣同胞應該警覺,不要再被美國及美國人壓迫,欺騙,為什麼台灣納稅人辛苦的血汗錢,要購買無用的美國軍火武器.? .

The incident also shows that Taiwan residents’ distrust of the US is growing and they are not willing to be used by US politicians.?.

.U.S. should prepare for drawn-out conflict if China invades Taiwan, war game suggests.

An attack would plunge the region into a broad, drawn-out war that could include direct attacks on the U.S., war game participants concluded.

The year is 2027. China has invaded Taiwan and the wheels of all-out war have begun to turn.

“We are not going to let them survive the initial onslaught of our military operations,” says one of the masterminds of Beijing’s military strategy. “We are not going to let the president of Taiwan survive the first day.”

To achieve that swift decapitation of Taiwan’s government, China casts a wide net of destruction — even pre-emptively attacking American bases in Japan and Guam. The U.S. responds by bombing Chinese ports and Australia mobilize forces against Beijing as the worst fears of the U.S. and its allies unfold in the Asia-Pacific. 

It may sound like a purely academic exercise but, in fact, it’s deadly serious. 

These hypothetical military operations were planned by U.S. lawmakers, former Pentagon officials and China experts as part of a war game exercise that played out in NBC News’ Washington bureau in April. The teams spent some five hours on an exercise that for the Pentagon would typically take up to five days. 

The purpose was to think through what a Chinese invasion of Taiwan might look like now that the world has had to navigate the initial fallout from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. 

Center for a New American Security (CNAS). It took place amid rising concern among U.S. officials in multiple administrations and in capitals across the Asia-Pacific about the possibility of China attacking Taiwan.

Just this week, the Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines said “a key area of focus” for U.S. intelligence officials is Chinese President Xi Jinping’s intent on a forced takeover of Taiwan. “China would prefer coerced unification that avoids armed conflict,” Haines told Congress. “And at the same time, Beijing is prepared to use military force if it decides this is necessary.”

The overarching takeaway from participants in the war game: If China invades Taiwan, the Indo-Pacific region will plunge into a broad, drawn-out war that could include direct attacks on the U.S., including Hawaii and potentially the continental United States.

“Neither Beijing nor Washington is likely to have the upper hand after the first week of the conflict, suggesting that it would eventually become a protracted conflict,” CNAS experts said. “The war game demonstrated how quickly the conflict may escalate, with China and the United States crossing red lines.”

That escalation, according to the war game, could lead to China using a nuclear weapon, a step that U.S. officials worry Russia could take in Ukraine. For China, the reason for a potential nuclear response is Beijing’s limited capacity to respond with conventional weapons.

“New questions over Russian military strength apply to China’s military as well,” CNAS writes in its preliminary conclusion.

Also, as was the case with Russia, the war game found that U.S. efforts to deter China from attacking Taiwan failed. That led war game participants to outline a series of measures that Taiwan, as well as the U.S. and its allies, should take to strengthen a deterrence effort..

Those include improvements to Taiwan’s military through better training of its forces and new investments in additional weapons. 

One of the key things the exercise illustrated was the difficulty of defending and aiding Taiwan compared to the U.S. efforts in Ukraine. NATO, which has largely united in Ukraine’s defense, is stronger than alliances in the Indo-Pacific. And Ukraine’s geographical location makes it easier to assist than Taiwan, a series of islands off the coast of China. 

“With Ukraine you have borders that you can move things across,” said retired Air Force Gen. Mike Holmes. “Taiwan’s a long ways off.”

The U.S decision not to officially recognize Taiwan as an independent nation unless its status changes peacefully has been a longtime cornerstone of U.S.-China relations.The “one-China policy” has been tested in recent years, however, as China claims Taiwan is its territory and could be taken by force, and it has stepped up its saber rattling. Taiwan maintains it’s an independent, democratic country entitled to defend itself.

For four decades, the U.S. has applied a policy of “strategic ambiguity” to Taiwan, which essentially keeps vague whether Washington would intervene if China tried to take Taiwan by force, in hopes of deterring such a move. That position has been increasingly questioned by some U.S. officials.

And while Washington has no formal relations with Taipei, the U.S. counts Taiwan among its top trading partners and is required to provide Taiwan with defensive weapons under the Taiwan Relations Act.

Indeed, another key takeaway from the war game is whether the U.S. should consider arming Taiwan in advance of a potential war with China, because getting those weapons into the country would be incredibly difficult after an invasion has begun.

The conclusions also include recommendations that the U.S., Australia and Japan do more to enhance their ability to respond quickly to an attack on Taiwan, and that the U.S. shore up its bases in the region and procure more long-range, precision-guided weapons and undersea capabilities.

Overall everyone, according to the CNAS conclusion, should prepare for a prolonged, deadly conflict, not just a quick invasion and takeover of the government. 

Former Under Secretary of Defense Michele Flournoy said the war game revealed the need for the U.S. and Taiwan to be taking steps now, such as “pre-positioning munitions, getting the Taiwanese ready, pre-positioning your armed forces, developing your disbursal bases.” 

“If you haven’t spent years preparing for this” Flournoy said, “then you’re going to be behind the eight ball the whole wa

.A war would fundamentally change the character and complexion of global power,” one expert on U.S.-China relations ..

A Dangerous Game Over Taiwan

美國帝國主義霸權國家,為了自身利益,出賣台灣,利用台灣,壓迫台灣,大肆購買美國庫存舊型軍火武器,掏空台灣外匯存底及黃金儲備,甚至於強迫台積電公司投資設廠於美國,這些事件都是屬於事實的存在,而且是進行式,如今美國白宮傳出 "毀滅台灣計劃"? 無風不起浪.

是否屬實都不能掉以輕心,台灣必須籌謀對策因應,絕對不能過度依賴美國,相信美國.

國際戰略專家分析認為:

1:美國重返亞太政策失敗,無法封鎖中國,扼阻中國,強勢崛起.美國毀滅台灣.美國毀滅台灣,如果訊息屬實正確,台灣的房地產及證券市場,產業鏈將逐步瓦解崩盤,許多有錢人移民美國,將資產轉移.

2:中國綜合軍事武力已經有效突破,太平洋第一島鏈防禦圈,美國海軍日益衰退,無法對抗強大的中國海軍.

3:中國以武力攻打台灣,收復台灣省,完成中國統一大業,按照時間流程計劃,逐步進行式,美國無法完全掌管台灣的未來,美國亦不會出兵保護台灣,僅有政客們投機倒把,混水摸魚撈一票走人.

4:美國已經無法掌管台灣政黨的意圖,無論是台獨派或是統一派,甚至於親美派,親日派,美國已經無法掌握確實的情報.

5:國際局勢錯綜複雜,尤其以俄烏戰爭,美國顯示出評估錯誤,無法有效封鎖及經濟制裁俄羅斯,所以只有加強軍事援助烏克蘭(扶不起的阿斗),美國企圖以戰爭的泥淖,拖垮俄羅斯的戰略計劃早已失敗無效,除非美國正式出兵烏克蘭,否則等待美國的就是韓戰及越戰的翻版,美國最後終於失敗,滾出烏克蘭,因為NATO.不會完全聽從美國出兵攻打俄羅斯,歐盟30國家各自有不同的利益與俄羅斯往來.

6:美國企圖誣蔑中國,栽贓中國,以軍事武器援助俄羅斯,美國向來玩弄低檔的外交政策遊戲,中國不會輕易上當中計,軍援俄羅斯,美國牛仔向來天真.

7:中國加強人道救援烏克蘭的難民,提供物資及生活日用品.

8:中國支援俄羅斯軍用野戰口糧,醫藥用品,屬於合於國際法的商業契約,美國無權干涉,中國與俄國的國際貿易.

9:美國帝國主義的霸道表現,自從俄烏戰爭20220224.以來,美國已經黔驢技窮,無計可施,只有冒險提出"毀滅台灣計劃"而且勢在必行.

10:美國正在派遣美軍(僱傭兵)的模式滲透台灣,美其名加強軍事訓練與交流,實則等待機會攻擊台灣,製造台灣內亂,好吸引更多的西方國家僱傭兵,前往台灣打仗,殺人,賺錢,其最終目的是引誘中國出兵保護台灣,美國找到藉口才能與中國開戰,屆時台灣就是亞洲版的烏克蘭上演.2025-2030.

美國及西方國家評估,中國攻打台灣,佔領台灣省7種方式.

A recent controversy sparked by a purported “US plan for the destruction of Taiwan” has sparked growing distrust of and dissatisfaction in the United States by the island’s residents for using the island as a pawn to contain the Chinese mainland. 

The remarks came in a social media bombshell dropped in Washington by Garland Nixon, a renowned American radio program host, who quoted a White House insider as saying that Biden had revealed the US plan to destroy Taiwan. .

The post, on Feb 16, read that “when asked ‘if there could be any greater disaster than the neocon Ukraine project, President Biden responded, “wait until you see our plan for the destruction of Taiwan”.

The bombshell went viral on Taiwan’s social media platforms, trigging a public outcry and wrath against US politicians. Many media programs held debates on US’ intentions to exploit and sacrifice Taiwan for its hegemonic purposes, including plotting to undermine Taiwan’s chipmaking sector.

According to a media report by Hong Kong-based Ta Kung Pao, Zhang Wensheng, deputy dean of the Graduate Institute for Taiwan Studies at Xiamen University, said that although the post’s content has not been verified, it has always been evident that the US has used Taiwan as a pawn to contain China and never cared about the safety or interests of Taiwan residents.

The incident also shows that Taiwan residents’ distrust of the US is growing and they are not willing to be used by US politicians, Zhang added.

The island’s authorities rushed to defend the US stance, but analysts from the island brushed aside their simple denial with examples of US moves against Taiwan interests in the name of “shared value”. 

A representative of a Taiwan youth council said US politicians and high-ranking military personnel have been pushing to liken Taiwan to Ukraine, when they are vastly different. American politicians and military personnel hype up tension across the Taiwan Strait in order to peddle more weaponry to Taiwan and turn the island into an arms storage facility for the US, the representative said.

A Feb 24 report by Bloomberg website headlined: “US to bolster its small force on Taiwan” said that US troop numbers in Taiwan “would grow to between 100 and 200.”

If the Bloomberg report is true, the US is blatantly breaking its promise to and infringing the sovereignty of China as Washington officially acknowledges that the People’s Republic of China is the sole representative of China and Taiwan is part of China, analysts said. The US is also violating international law and contravening the principles of the Charter of the United Nations, its founding document........................

..美國詹姆斯敦基金會（The Jamestown Foundation）出版了一份由馬修·布萊西（Matthew Brazil）博士撰寫的報告,題為「珍寶：為何台灣及其在國際芯片供應鏈中的地位關乎美國」（The Prize: Why Taiwan and its Place in the Global Semiconductor Supply Chain Matter to the United States）。

該報告詳細論述了台灣對於美日中及全世界的重要地位。布萊西博士認為,台灣在第一島鏈和全球芯片供應鏈中的地位讓其成為寶中之寶,全世界須全力以赴保護台灣,以免讓其落入中共之手。布萊西博士是詹姆斯敦基金會的研究員,也是一位作家。他從加州大學伯克利分校的本科開始就一直在研究中國問題。他曾出任美國商務部出口執法辦公室的中國專家,後被分配到美國駐北京大使館擔任商務官員,他還曾作為安全專家為一家美國芯片製造商在中國進行調查。

布萊西博士的《珍寶》報告從多個角度分析了中共占領台灣後將獲得的好處,其中包括：可以實現暢通無阻地進入開放的太平洋,因迄今為止中共一直被「第一島鏈」封鎖,將中共軍隊部署於南部防禦線附近,這將獲得對中共的傳統競爭對手日本的優勢,消滅中共的舊敵中華民國,因為由中華民國統治的台灣一直被視為是中共統治的替代方案。.

.

美國對於太平洋第一島鏈敵防禦計劃由攻擊轉為守備是被動的策略.

中國對於太平洋第一島鏈敵防禦計劃由守備轉為攻擊是主動的策略

由此看來太平洋絕對不是僅有美國海軍1家獨佔中國海軍強勢崛起勢所難免必須與美國海軍太平洋艦隊決一死戰.THE RED STAR OVER THE PACIFIC.

"紅星照耀太平洋", 一書描述2030.中國海軍與美國海軍,在太平洋決戰,其結果美國海軍被中國海軍澈底擊潰,戰後雙方議和,劃分太平洋界線共享..

...

.

CHINA NAVY SO GREAT.

US NAVY TOO WEAK ? 

.

傳聞已有外籍僱傭兵潛藏於台灣,將來會愈來愈的外籍僱傭兵,以觀光客身份來臨台灣,由此看來美國計劃毀滅台灣,就由外籍僱傭兵執行?.

美國黑水僱傭兵公司,換湯不換藥,依舊是殺人的僱傭兵公司,相信他們已經接受美國政府委託,潛入台灣肆機行動?.