55樓. 檢察官

2009/08/25 10:27

有假的professor
好心網友都支持林志玲,  妳的資訊不靈, 當時林志玲應在東京和SMAP拍MV.
Sorry sorry

54樓. Durham

2009/08/24 11:04

to Something to Say
(sorry..hit "send" by mistake a few minutes ago)
Thank you for proving one point: Anything posted online is subject to judgment and criticism. I guess that’s what everyone here is doing, including you and me. And if you can, don’t forget to help out with the relief operation. We can use all the help we get.

53樓. Durham

2009/08/24 10:54

to Teng and Something to Say
Your highness, thank you for enlightening me on 3 things:

1. That I am a fan of Ms. Lin's--gosh I never knew I was a fan. You must have read something no one else has been able to discern in my words. I thought I was merely saying Ms. Lin, like all of us, can choose to do whatever she thinks proper, to contribute in whatever way she deems effective. Oh and the "sex fantasy” part? Gee, thanks. That’s hilarious. 2. That professors or PhD's don't necessarily know better. I used to fantasize about professors and once thought they were wise, cool-headed, and just. Thanks for proving me wrong. 3. That you have a serious issue with Ms. Lin's degree. You have to keep mentioning it, don't you? Forgive me for not seeing the relevance here. But again, as you're the professor, I don't think you can ever be wrong. (Wait...this contradicts with my previous point...)

52樓. 純好奇

2009/08/24 10:08

敢問版大你做了甚麼?

您好

拜讀了您的大作,內心真的是覺得非常的佩服

不過我很好奇的是

請問您能否告訴我們廣大的網民

您在這次88水患中捐了多少錢?(佔您的收入幾分之幾?)

還有跟您筆下被挖苦的林志玲相比

您是否有"沒那麼優雅地"去災區捲起衣袖去挖汙泥去嗅屍體?(有圖才有真相喔)

跟您筆下做十幾天志工的秦揚相比

你做了幾天?????

還有

昨天在吃飯時跟朋友聊到您的文章&觀點

我們都很仰慕您說

能否請您公佈一下您的大名啊

我跟友人好馬上檢查手機裡的通訊錄

馬上DELETE掉

謝謝 千萬別聯絡喔!!

51樓. 路人甲

2009/08/24 08:26

讀後感

內容空洞幼稚的文章

50樓. Teng

2009/08/23 17:41

Duram and brighton

Re: Duram

Should read: Nor is it your darned business. A typo.

To: Brighton

Do not let these naive fans of phony woman Lin and their shallow attacks bother you.

I agree with you and your view on phony Lin and support you without reservation.

Keep up with the good work, good views and good comments.

Prof. C H Teng, Ph.D.

Canada

49樓. Teng

2009/08/23 17:21

Duram

Re: Duram's sex fantasy about phony Lin

Nor is your darned business, Duram.

Pity you to be a fan of such a phony "double-majored" old lady.

No such a student in Canada

Prof. Teng in Canada

48樓. 冷眼

2009/08/23 12:35

現世報
批評別人不留餘地  .... 惡有惡報 .... 而且是現世報

47樓. 好奇寶寶

2009/08/23 12:34

作者跟志玲姊姊很熟嗎?

不知道作者是跟志玲姊姊很熟嗎?...

不然怎麼會很主觀的認為志玲姊姊現在閒閒沒事沒工作呢?...

您在文章裡面寫...
好啦，「劉文聰」秦楊都在災區當了半個月志工，揹了不少災民脫困了，志玲姊姊，你就別再優雅了，周杰倫還在拍戲，蔡依林還有廣告在拍

這些是不是也是因為您認識他們,知道他們現在真正的工作情況而寫出的?...
還是也只是淪落到一個"照報照媒體抄"的文抄公而已呢?...

個人建議有些話,還是親眼看到之後再發表吧...

46樓. 不想說

2009/08/23 12:22

作者自己不知道貢獻了多少?...

果然一根指頭指著人罵...忘了另外四根指頭是對著自己...(雖然我現在可能也是)...

如果今天只是用很膚淺的金錢捐贈額度,來衡量這個人對於災民的貢獻...

那是不是救出全村一百多人的四位救難英雄,他們因為沒有捐錢...

所以就對災民沒有貢獻?....

現在正在前線辛苦挖屍的國軍弟兄們,他們沒有捐錢,所以也該批評他們沒貢獻?...

我不知道作者今天批評林志玲的立場跟捐贈數據,是僅有從媒體的報導上得知,或是有經過很詳細的調查,覺得她的收入跟付出不成比例?(不然請問要捐多少才叫做有愛心?)

就像某位立委老婆在媒體痛罵五月天沒有關心災民...

但卻不知道五月天早就在不求出名的默默行善一樣...

如果只是為了在媒體上曝光出名而付出的,這不嫌太矯情,也太刻意了嗎?...