Contents ...
udn網路城邦
由媒體失格到政府踢鐵板
2013/05/17 10:48
瀏覽5,019
迴響10
推薦7
引用0

冷靜不是軟弱,也非麻木,這是面對問題最好的態度,而問題要釐清與解決,不是擴大。把問題擴大是媒體的副產品,蘋果日報今日登出《我艦隊越線護漁 菲竟諷馬聲望低》、《菲國囂張 不甩台調查團》是把副產品的利用價值無限擴大。

 

前一則新聞移花接木不值一提,記者出身的黃創夏據此寫出《不怕菲反覆,最怕馬遲疑!》一文,是配合媒體興風作浪達到高點;後面這則新聞是截取菲國總統府發言人陳顯達的部份發言所做的報導,非常可議。二則新聞都以【綜合報導】署名,記者是非常心虛;對照聯合報新聞《我調查團 在菲律賓踢鐵板》、《菲司法部長:不能同意聯合調查》,顯然我國漁船槍擊事件調查團未獲菲國同意即以成行,而我國提出聯合調查的申請能否獲得菲國同意,看菲國司法部長德利馬女士的發言,不問自明。

 

馬政府口頭禪是「依法辦理」,過去「依法辦理」是對內提醒國人─至於馬政府本身有沒有「依法辦理」是另外一回事,現在「依法辦理」是菲國對馬政府的敬告,這回馬政府的「依法辦理」碰到菲國的「依法辦理」是踢到鐵板。

 

菲國的「依法辦理」有沒有錯呢?看看我們內政部、環保署與台東縣政府處理美麗灣違反環評違建案便知道答案。在2012920日最高行政法院判決開發違法定讞後,923環保署長沈世宏指稱「美麗灣是實質違建,但建照核發不是環保署業務,應該依《建管法》由內政部處理。」1211內政部長李鴻源表示「雖然沒有『實質違建』的問題,但有『程序違建』的情形」並建議台東縣政府最好是拆掉美麗灣、認賠了事。隨後台東縣政府祕書長陳金虎反批「美麗灣不是個人說拆就拆,也不是個人或團體認為要怎樣就怎樣,內政部是否能介入,有相關法令規範,勿以個人意見傷害地方政府。」他所說的相關法令是地方自治法。於是「依法辦理」,中央尊重地方自治,最高行政法院的判決卻等同無效。

 

小至縣市大至國家,疆界有海洋、高山、河川與界碑等等有形的區隔,無形的區隔有語言、風俗文化與宗教信仰等等,其中法律的區隔既不屬於有形也不是無形,而是一條灰色的地帶。種種區隔,某方面保障人們的安全,某方面阻礙人類往和諧相處的文明邁進。這些我們都知道,但世界永無止息的衝突似乎無解

有誰推薦more
全站分類:時事評論 政治
自訂分類:不分類
迴響(10) :
10樓. Esq.
2013/05/23 19:46
回應 Jury 之 "国際法"
Below is the "governing law" cited by the author.  Would you tell me where does it say the enforcer can use deadly weapons on fleeing "poachers"?  Because without it, his entire argument falls apart.

1. The coastal State may, in the exercise of its sovereign rights to explore, exploit, conserve and manage the living resources in the exclusive economic zone, take such measures, including boarding, inspection, arrest and judicial proceedings, as may be necessary to ensure compliance with the laws and regulations adopted by it in conformity with this Convention.
9樓. jury
2013/05/18 15:12
国際法
Legally speaking, the issue is whether the use of force is necessary for the Philippines Coast Guard to enforce its rights under Article 73, paragraph 1 of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. Preventing suspect poachers from 'fleeing' the jurisdiction of the coastal state concerned, including the disabling of suspect vessels by the use of arms, is a legitimate means to that end. Whether the said Taiwanese vessel attempted to flee, which would be crucial to determining on the legality (ie necessity in this case) of the Philippines Coast Guard's use of force, cannot be answered until all legal procedures, including thorough investigation, are completed.

Premature reactions from Taiwan, official and civil, in the wake of this unfortunate incident simply made matters more complicated. It is the principle of equal sovereignty, not sincerity, that is the cardinal rule of international relations. Sadly, denied statehood, Taiwan doesn't understand how sovereign states interact with each other in the postwar international legal system. Did the incident result from territorial disputes between Taiwan and the Philippines? No. Is there any territorial dispute over Batanes between Taiwan and the Philippines? No. If so, what is the point of sending armed forces near the territorial waters of the Philippines? To take an undisputed territory of the Philippines like Batanese away from the Philippines would be a blatant violation of Article 2 of the UN Charter. Put bluntly, it is an aggressive war. Or, conducting war games is just a way to put pressure on the Philippines. Doesn't this evoke the dated gunboat diplomacy in the imperial age? I don't think this is a wise way to win public opinions in the international society.
8樓. whola
2013/05/18 02:38
文化素養
如今的媒體人,除了搶頭條誇大其詞之外,其新聞內涵空洞無章,尤其是影視媒體在播報現場所提問的問題令人覺的是個小學生在問老師〝為什麼〞!除了搖頭苦笑,只剩〝國罵三字〞!
7樓. 路人
2013/05/17 22:24
哈哈
寫黃創夏,就有網工前來伺候。
不過,隨便怎麼寫,也比那黃二百五強多了。
6樓. 漢人
2013/05/17 22:18
欲言又止的屁文。

南(島語族)漢區隔、心結? 還是你在聲援千年遠古的同祖遠親?

5樓. 臺灣人
2013/05/17 19:18
不以為然

是在放屁嗎

4樓. 123
2013/05/17 16:31
蘋果日報不意外

蘋果日報不意外,

因為一堆綠營的前黨工進去上班,

原本剛在台灣創刊的前幾年還算中立,

這幾年越來越綠, 也越來越會亂寫,

可與三民自並立為綠營四大喉舌.

3樓. wings
2013/05/17 16:31
.
..若能每天固定作功課,每月固定作功德,長期參加共修、放生、大法會,當可化解許多災難意外及無名病痛或因果病的發生,自然讓我們省下很多時間、金錢在解決這些災難與苦痛。人不要遇到事情,才費時費神費財的去解決問題及病痛苦難,還不如將這些所費的時間、精神、錢財,改為平時每日花個一、二小時的時間,來固定作功課,比如:祈禱、誦經拜佛等。
2樓. police
2013/05/17 15:40
說的很中肯
加油!像這樣不譁眾取寵、不扇動民粹的言論很少了,請努力多發文!
1樓. abc
2013/05/17 13:29
BS
Full of BS. What will you do?
發表迴響

會員登入