illusory differences
2010/08/19 20:19
瀏覽547
迴響2
推薦4
引用0
There is very definitively an illusion, but there is no ground to which the illusion refers, nor is there any reason to imagine that the Madyamika's deconstructive analysis culminates in a brave new world of the spirit where all possibility of contradiction and diversity is resolved. We must turn the conversation from talk of resolution... to discussion of an insight or attention--a refined, purified love of this world--that never ceases to illuminate, destabilize, and simultaneously affirm differences which are themselves supported by other, suppressed forms of illusory differences.
--C.W. Huntington, "The Emptiness of Emptiness"
--C.W. Huntington, "The Emptiness of Emptiness"
迴響（2） ：
2樓. 沙丘文學2010/08/20 15:31I already understood
I have understood, I only am have the different view to your this article? But your response, is acceptable. And thanks your suggestion.-
1樓. 沙丘文學2010/08/20 07:02The idea is very good
In other words, today' the s literary arts industry, is the urgent question? Must first have the area of knowledge, and is related fantasized that the basic situation, this has one kind of legitimate sufficient reason. Therefore periphery, how to regard our idea, is unimportant? But we must with this new vernacular literature time discussion. Discovered that your literature idea is very good, also gives you to affirm.－Sha Chfou－Actually, that's not my idea, nor is it about literature. It was taken from a book on Buddhism, specifically the Middle Way. The book discusses Nagarjuna and Chandrakirti, but applies the concepts of deconstruction.
I am not a literary theorist, and don't really have much thought on literature from a theoretical angle. I think theory can be very abstract and criticism is often far away from actual literary works. On this, I am very old-fashioned--I think practical criticism focusing on specific text is more useful than generalization. ZY 於 2010/08/20 12:33回覆
