中華民國是正統，從歷史的觀點來看，中華人民共和國只能算是暫時分裂割據的陸獨政治組織，有點類似當年的滿州國和現在的蒙古國，但是從我們中華民國台灣台北行都的眼光看來，這些分裂割據勢力，都只是歷史的暫時現象，鋒頭一過，還不是得乖乖回到中華民國的轄下？https://www.president.gov.tw/Page/99
簡單的說：台灣的底線就是兩岸同屬中華民國...中華人民共和國只是中華民國底下一個陸獨分裂勢力...證據是：中華民國仍在聯合國，老共無權更動席次名號...什麼是九二共識的真相：中華民國仍在聯合國...九二共識就是兩岸同屬中華民國...直到現在，依然是如此：
各表與否，並非重點...
因為都是中華民國：咱們的歷史定位是："中華民國內戰時期暫時行都台灣台北政府"，對岸是："中華民國分裂割據勢力陸獨叛國叛黨中華人民共和國蘇維埃政府"，嚴格說來，兩岸同屬於中華民國，而且咱是中華民國的正統，他們是"中華民國轄下月領63萬法幣卻違抗軍令私自割據大陸導致分裂國土的八路叛軍"，咱是中華民國正統，咱有中華民國之璽，他們沒有，他們說是取代中華民國，卻沒證據，咱們是正統中華民國，怕什麼？
2758號決議文，講得很清楚，就是說中華民國只是換人當值日生而已，中華民國的位置已經換人坐了，而不是中華民國的席次被取消...這個席次一直都在，而且也是一直都是中華民國，所以拜託，這就是你們自己的家，只是現在值日生換人而已...你你們中華民國就不要再來說，要"重新申請"中華民國的位置啦，它一直都在，沒有消失好嗎？......倒是你們中華民國要自己決定好，到底是派誰當值日生.....你們中華民國自己決定好，派誰當值日生，很難嗎？.
咱中華民國曾經出現過幾個政府你統計過嗎？九二共識就是"中國只有一個，就是中華民國"，那個"中華人民共和國"，只能算是"中華民國"底下，一個私自分裂的"地方割據"勢力，按歷史的觀點來說，有點類似"滿州國"的概念，不是真正的中國，所以咱"中華民國"，只要存在的一天，就是"中華人民共和國"的"主子"，這就是"九二共識"---兩岸同屬中華民國的終極涵意。 咱中華民國曾經出現過：南京政府，北京政府，北洋政府，武漢政府，殷汝耕政府，汪精衛政府，廣州大元帥政府，福建人民革命政府，國民革命軍政府，延安蘇維埃政府，國民政府，蒙古國，滿州國，東土耳其斯坦共和國，，中華人民共和國，....，這還只是大約舉例，不是詳細名單喔，...就已經出現過這麼多政府和國家了...
但是又如何？還不都是中華民國？
"中華人民共和國"，按歷史的觀點，在中華民國還在的時候，其地位，頂多是像當初的滿州國，現在的蒙古國分裂一樣，....最後還不都得回到中華民國...?現在的蒙古國，東土耳其斯坦共和國，中華人民共和國，還有一個果敢國，在歷史上，自稱國也好，有多少邦交國都沒關係，(當年滿州國有23個邦交國，比現在的中華民國行都台灣台北政府的邦交國還多...)，蒙古國多一點(有191個邦交國)，但是又如何？從歷史長河來說，這些都是"歷史的暫時狀態"....將來也都是要回到中華民國的...
-----------------
只是，不知道這個將還還要等多久？
-----------------------
等待...心誠則靈...只要願意等， 堅守崗位，相信中華民國可以克服一切難關，自然就會成功...
現在中華民國最大的隱憂，反而是那一群因不懂行情，似乎有點看輕中華民國的真實價值，也不太願意珍惜自己拿在手上的玉璽，一直想要學某巫克或巫某蘭的那些人...著實令人擔心...
------------------------------------
The Republic of China is orthodox. From a historical point of view, the Peoples Republic of China can only be regarded as a political organization of Lu independence that was temporarily divided. It is somewhat similar to Manchukuo and Mongolia now. From the point of view, these separatist forces are only temporary phenomena in history. Once the front has passed, shouldnt they obediently return to the jurisdiction of the Republic of China?
Simply put: Taiwans bottom line is that both sides of the strait belong to the Republic of China... The Peoples Republic of China is just a separatist force under the Republic of China. The evidence is: the Republic of China is still in the United Nations, and the Lao Communist Party has no right to change its seat... What is the truth of the 1992 Consensus: The Republic of China is still at the United Nations... The 1992 Consensus is that both sides of the Taiwan Strait belong to the Republic of China... Until now, this is still the case:
Whether each table or not is not the point...
Because they are both the Republic of China: our historical positioning is: "the government of Taiwan and Taipei temporarily traveled to the capital during the civil war of the Republic of China", and the other side is: "the separatist forces of the Republic of China, the separatist forces, the rebellion against the country and the Soviet government of the Peoples Republic of China". Strictly speaking, Both sides of the strait belong to the Republic of China, and we are the orthodox of the Republic of China. They are "the eighth-way rebels under the control of the Republic of China who received 630,000 French dollars a month but disobeyed the military order and privately divided the mainland and led to the division of the country", we are the orthodox of the Republic of China, we have China They dont have the seal of the Republic of China. They say it replaces the Republic of China, but there is no evidence. We are the orthodox Republic of China. What are we afraid of?
Resolution No. 2758 makes it very clear that the Republic of China is just a replacement for the day-to-day life. The seat of the Republic of China has been replaced, not that the seat of the Republic of China has been cancelled... This seat has always been there, and It has always been the Republic of China, so please, this is your own home, its just a replacement for your birthday... You and the Republic of China dont talk about it anymore, you have to "reapply" for the position of the Republic of China, it has always been Its all there, its not gone, okay? ...... But you, the Republic of China, have to decide for yourself, who will be assigned to be on duty...... You, the Republic of China, have to decide for yourself, who is to be assigned to be a native, is it difficult? .
Have you counted how many governments have appeared in the Republic of China? The 1992 consensus is that "there is only one China, the Republic of China." The "Peoples Republic of China" can only be regarded as a "local separatist" force that splits privately under the "Republic of China". From a historical point of view, it is somewhat similar." The concept of Manchukuo is not the real China, so our "Republic of China" will be the "master" of the "Peoples Republic of China" as long as it exists. the ultimate meaning. Our Republic of China has appeared: the Nanjing government, the Beijing government, the Beiyang government, the Wuhan government, the Yin Rugeng government, the Wang Jingwei government, the Guangzhou Grand Marshal government, the Fujian Peoples Revolutionary Government, the National Revolutionary Military Government, the Yanan Soviet Government, the National Government, Mongolia, Manchurian The state, the Republic of East Turkestan, the Peoples Republic of China, .... This is just an example, not a detailed list. ... There have been so many governments and countries ...
But so what? Isnt it the Republic of China?https://www.president.gov.tw/Page/99
"The Peoples Republic of China", according to the historical point of view, when the Republic of China was still in existence, its status was at most the same as that of the original Manchukuo and the current Mongolian split....In the end, they have to return to The Republic of China...? The current Mongolia, the East Turkestan Republic, the Peoples Republic of China, and a Kokang state. Historically, it doesnt matter how many countries it has diplomatic relations with, whether it calls itself a country, (Manchuria had 23 diplomatic relations at that time China has more diplomatic ties than the current ROC capital, Taiwan, and the Taipei government...), and Mongolia has a little more (191 diplomatic ties), but so what? From the perspective of the long history, these are all "temporary states of history"... In the future, they will all return to the Republic of China...
-----------------
Just, I dont know how long this will have to wait?
-----------------------
Waiting...sincere heart...As long as you are willing to wait, stick to your post, believe that the Republic of China can overcome all difficulties, it will naturally succeed...
The biggest worry of the Republic of China now is the group of people who do not understand the market and seem to underestimate the true value of the Republic of China, and are not willing to cherish the jade seal they hold in their hands. They have always wanted to learn from a certain Wu Ke or Wu Moulan. Those people...really worrying...
--------------------------------------------------------
[轉貼]張大智
（日人的後世，忘了祖輩的最大心願！）日人的後世，忘了祖輩的最大心願！當年（約在民國54年，西元1965年）岸信介、佐藤喜一諸位日本政要，之所以要用“中日合作策進會”的名義，發展中日的區域觀光事業，促進中日的長期經濟合作，日方提供中華民國資金和技術援助，中日兩國的經濟人員經常會談，切實推動中日文化交流，對我方推行的長期經濟建設，提供技術協助，兩國的新聞界、學術界，和藝術界互訪，促成兩國將原子能用於和平用途，交換電視紀錄片，等等，是植基於日人對蔣公“以德報怨”作法的感念，尤其以岸信介為最！岸氏尤支持 蔣公“收復大陸國土”的“一個中國”主張！然而，今所悲嘆者，是其後人竟然沒有此些先祖的大認識、大氣度和大作為，竟然迷糊到要來救援一個正在假“轉型正義”之花言巧語，來醜化和妖魔化受他們先祖所萬分感恩的 蔣公的教民數典忘祖，教民恩將仇報的“忘本政權”！其二者，是他們的祖輩，所以要和“中華民國”合作建設台灣，是因為這些有遠識的政治家，堅定支持“中華民國是代表中國的政府”，而今天的“中華民國憲法”，依然是“一個中國”架構，但是所讓人悲嘆的是，岸氏的後人，竟然認不清，現在“借殼上市”的小撮，是妄圖以“台灣國”來掩蓋“中華民國”的，小撮是千方百計地，來否定中國文化（如不以“中國人”稱，而脅誘以“華人”；不以“中國語”稱，而脅誘以“華語”；不以“中國佛教”稱，而脅誘以“華梵”；不以“中藥”稱，而脅誘以“漢藥”；不以妥適的“再見”稱，而脅誘以“by-by"，肆虐地全島喪失我中華民族靈魂和意識！又胡言什麼“長江、黃河與台灣無關！”、“二十四節氣，不適用於台灣！”、“中國北方沒天后宮！（大陸南北的靠海地區，都有”天后宮”）等等的完全不正確謬論！且扭曲其為多元南島文化，其不向“中原意識”移動靠攏，讓“民德歸厚”！必然就會滑向和形成“數典忘祖”的“五倫相殘”（台島層出不窮的弒親和逆倫慘案，實出因於此！）局面，這就是正確政治方針與不正確政治方針，禍褔人民百姓的奧妙處之所在！對此一“忘本小撮”，岸氏後人，還看不明白，了解不深入，這可能就是一般政客們，為自己造成大困局的問題、宿命和癥結點之所在了！
