Oct 2026 Bybit Referral Code BTC9149 | What Is an Inverse | 58% Off
Take the same BTCUSD position — 10,000 USD short — and watch the market rally to 25,000 USD. You would expect a flat 1,000 USD loss. That is not what happens. An inverse contract holds BTC as margin and settles profit and loss in BTC, so as price rises your collateral appreciates too, and the loss on the short accelerates. That break from proportional payoffs is the defining and most overlooked feature of the product. This guide breaks apart the quote currency, the margin structure, the profit and loss formula and the non-linear consequences, so that when you see the word inverse you know exactly which risk you are taking on.
BTC9149
Bybit referral code BTC9149
33% trading fee discount from the code, and once MNT fee deduction is enabled the two stack into an up to 58% fee discount
- What an inverse contract is in one line
- Three structural differences: quote, margin, settlement
- The core: why profit and loss is non-linear
- Two real consequences of that non-linearity
- Inverse perpetual vs inverse expiry
- A risk exposure you may not have counted
- How to start trading it on Bybit
- FAQ
- Risk reminder
- Summary
What an inverse contract is in one line
The structure fits in a single sentence: inverse contracts are quoted in dollars, but margin and profit and loss are calculated and settled in the underlying asset.
Take BTCUSD inverse perpetual as the example. The contract price is displayed in dollars, and you place orders in contract quantity or in notional dollar value — but what the system actually takes as collateral is BTC, and what lands in your account when you close is BTC. This is the clean opposite of a USDT perpetual, where margin is USDT and the result is expressed in USDT.
| Structural element | Inverse (BTCUSD) | Linear (BTCUSDT) |
|---|---|---|
| Quote currency | USD | USDT |
| Margin asset | BTC (the underlying) | USDT |
| Settlement asset | BTC (the underlying) | USDT |
| What one unit represents | A fixed dollar notional, minimum order one USD per contract | Sized in coins |
| P&L formula | Contains a 1÷price term, so it is non-linear | Linear and proportional |
| Typical pairs | BTCUSD, ETHUSD | BTCUSDT, ETHUSDT and more |
Three structural differences: quote, margin, settlement
The first difference is the quote. The price of an inverse contract is a dollar price, but buying one contract does not deliver a fixed quantity of BTC — it delivers a fixed dollar notional. How much BTC that notional equals depends entirely on the price at the moment you open. This is where all the non-linearity enters.
The second difference is the margin. To open a BTCUSD inverse contract you need BTC in your derivatives account. Margin, maintenance margin and the liquidation test are all computed in BTC. A linear contract uses USDT for the same job, so how much position you can open simply tracks how much USDT you hold.
The third difference is settlement. Profit and loss is delivered in BTC. If a BTC contract long earns, the credit is BTC; if it loses, the debit is BTC. That means your final result combines the profit or loss of the position plus the price move of the collateral itself — and those two can reinforce or cancel each other out.
A useful shorthand: inverse contracts earn coins on coins. What you receive is BTC or ETH, not dollars. If your goal is to hold more of the asset, this is intuitive. If your goal is dollars, the behaviour is far less intuitive than it looks.
The core: why profit and loss is non-linear
Linear contract profit and loss is intuitive: notional value times the price move. The inverse formula adds a 1÷price term, and that single term changes the whole structure.
| Direction | How profit and loss is calculated |
|---|---|
| Long | Contract quantity × (1 ÷ entry price − 1 ÷ exit price) |
| Short | Contract quantity × (1 ÷ exit price − 1 ÷ entry price) |
The 1 ÷ price term is the source of the non-linearity. The higher the price, the smaller that term; the lower the price, the larger it becomes. Linear contracts have no such term, so an identical market move produces a payoff that deviates from the proportional intuition in an inverse contract.
The official example makes it concrete:
| Step | Price | BTC equivalent |
|---|---|---|
| Open a 10,000 USD contract long | 23,000 USD | about 0.435 BTC |
| Price rises, close the whole position | 25,000 USD | 0.400 BTC |
| Profit | — | 0.435 − 0.400 = 0.035 BTC |
Look at the last row: the profit is a quantity of BTC, not a dollar amount. The same trade on an equivalent USDT contract would settle in USDT. In a violent market that difference becomes very large.
Two real consequences of that non-linearity
Once the formula is understood, two conclusions follow naturally, and they are the ones most often mixed up in live trading.
Consequence one: a 1x long can still be liquidated, a 1x short cannot
Because the margin is itself BTC, a falling price devalues the margin and the position at the same time, so losses arrive faster than a straight line would suggest. At 1x leverage a long runs into the maintenance margin level at roughly a 50% decline; a 1x short facing a rally is, in theory, never liquidated. That is completely unlike the linear intuition that 1x cannot be liquidated.
The practical consequence: if you carry over your liquidation intuition from linear contracts, an inverse long will be closed out earlier than you expect. Do not apply entry price × (1 ± 1 ÷ leverage) here — use the liquidation price the platform displays.
Consequence two: the further the trend runs, the more your gains compress and your losses expand
Take the same 10x long. A linear long is liquidated at roughly a 10% adverse move. The inverse long is liquidated slightly earlier than that, around 9%, because margin and underlying move together. The short is the opposite: an inverse short is liquidated further out than 10%, because a rising price also inflates the BTC you posted as margin, adding a second layer to the loss.
| Leverage | Linear (long / short) | Inverse (long / short) |
|---|---|---|
| 2x | −50% / +50% | −33% / +100% |
| 5x | −20% / +20% | −16.7% / +25% |
| 10x | −10% / +10% | −9.1% / +11.1% |
| 1x | −100% (never) / +100% | −50% / never |
The table shows indicative magnitudes; the real liquidation price is calculated by the venue from the current maintenance margin rate and already accounts for fees and funding. The rule to remember is this: an inverse long is slightly safer than its linear equivalent, and an inverse short is meaningfully more dangerous. That single fact should influence which direction you pick.
Inverse perpetual vs inverse expiry
Inverse contract is an umbrella term covering two products that differ on one point: whether they expire.
| Item | Inverse perpetual | Inverse expiry |
|---|---|---|
| Expiry | No expiry, hold as long as you like | Fixed settlement date |
| Costs | Trading fee plus funding fee | Trading fee; a settlement fee if held to expiry |
| Settlement | Instant, in the underlying asset | On the morning of the expiry date |
| Settlement price | Not applicable | Average index price over the last 30 minutes before expiry |
| Symbol format | BTCUSD, ETHUSD | XXXUSD-MMDD, such as BTCUSD0927 |
| Shared margin | Shares margin with the BTCUSD perpetual; one BTC account covers both | Same |
The most common mix-up: funding fees. Many people repeat that inverse contracts carry no funding fee — that statement applies to inverse expiry contracts only. An inverse perpetual still pays funding, calculated and settled in the underlying asset, while an inverse expiry charges neither while you hold but does charge a settlement fee at expiry. Confirm which product you are placing before you order.
One practical convenience is shared margin: collateral held against your BTCUSD inverse positions is shared across the same BTC account, so you are not preparing separate margin for every position.
A risk exposure you may not have counted
Inverse contracts carry one exposure that linear contracts do not: the market risk of the underlying asset itself.
The official documentation is explicit: inverse perpetuals are traded and settled in the underlying asset, so even with no position open at all, the BTC sitting in your account as collateral is exposed to that market's price moves. A linear contract settling in USDT does not carry this.
That produces a counter-intuitive outcome. Suppose you are short on the BTCUSD inverse contract and your collateral is also BTC: the BTC your short earns is partly eaten by the fall in BTC itself. This is not a strategy problem — it is a structural one.
One more cost beginners tend to miss: both profit and loss and funding fees affect what you actually keep. A position that looks profitable on screen can end up near break-even after two-sided trading fees and accumulated funding. On longer holds this matters a great deal.
How to start trading it on Bybit
The flow is not complicated, butyou must already hold the underlying asset — that is where most people get stuck.
- Step 1: register the account.Use the link carrying the referral code, https://partner.bybit.com/b/BTC9149, and the referral field fills with BTC9149 automatically. This is the route least likely to leave it blank.
- Step 2: confirm you hold the underlying asset.A BTCUSD inverse position requires BTC in the derivatives account. Under cross or portfolio margin in the Unified Trading Account, other supported assets can act as collateral, though profit and loss is still settled in the underlying.
- Step 3: switch to derivatives and pick the inverse contract.Choose pairs ending in USD, such as BTCUSD or ETHUSD, and do not mix them up with the BTCUSDT product.
- Step 4: choose your margin mode.The Unified Trading Account offers isolated, cross and portfolio modes with materially different behaviour, so know which one you are in before ordering.
- Step 5: test the smallest position first.Close it and watch the profit or loss arrive in BTC before deciding to size up.
FAQ
Q1: What is an inverse contract?
It is a contract whose margin and profit and loss are both calculated in the underlying asset. The price is quoted in dollars, but opening a BTCUSD inverse contract requires holding BTC, and the result is delivered in BTC. A linear contract uses USDT for margin and settles in USDT.
Q2: What does non-linear actually mean here?
It means the payoff is not a fixed proportion of the price move. The formula contains a 1÷price term, which grows as price falls. In practice, at the same leverage an inverse long is liquidated a little earlier than a linear long, while an inverse short is liquidated further out than a linear short. Losses accelerate on the way down for longs, and on the way up for shorts.
Q3: Do inverse contracts have funding fees?
It depends which one. An inverse perpetual does pay funding, calculated and settled in the underlying asset. An inverse expiry contract charges no funding while you hold, but does charge a settlement fee at expiry. The two have different expiry rules and settlement times, so confirm the product type before you order.
Risk reminder: Inverse contracts use the underlying asset as both margin and settlement currency, so you bear that asset's market risk even without an open position. Leverage magnifies gains and losses, and the non-linear structure means liquidation happens at different levels than on a linear contract. Price volatility can result in loss of principal, and fee discounts and funding costs may vary with account status and market conditions. This article is for information only and is not investment advice; check official pages for the actual liquidation prices and charges.
Summary
The definition of an inverse contract fits in one line: dollar quotes, underlying-asset margin, underlying-asset settlement. But what actually determines your risk is not the definition — it is the 1÷price term that makes payoff non-linear, which produces two rules worth memorising: a 1x long can still be liquidated, and at the same leverage an inverse short is more dangerous than a linear short.
Before you trade, get three things right: know whether you are placing an inverse perpetual or an inverse expiry, since that decides whether funding applies; confirm your margin mode and what collateral is actually backing the position; and accept the structural fact that collateral bears market risk even when you are flat. If you register with referral code BTC9149 and enable MNT fee deduction, trading fees reach an up to 58% discount — but that discount applies to trading fees only. It does not offset funding fees or settlement fees, and it does not make the non-linear risk go away.
下一則: 2026年10月 Bybit邀請碼BTC9149|反向合約是什麼:報價、保證金與非線性盈虧|最高58%手續費折扣
限會員,要發表迴響,請先登入


