Contents ...
udn網路城邦
瘋咽與總編 On HK's Media
2014/02/13 21:58
瀏覽990
迴響16
推薦0
引用0

已經想不起上次為香港感到高興是多久以前的事了。No news is good news。 新聞都不是好消息。當真?凡事總有例外!昨天傍晚的大好新聞令余興奮得在手機上與幾個朋輩群組奔走相告,額手稱慶。馬年伊始,香港少一點戾氣,恭喜恭喜!
香港是法治社會,這點反對派--尤其是狀棍黨,比誰都更清楚,亦更懂得及已多次濫用司法系統干擾施政,例如找個無知阿婆申請法援以環評程序細節提出司法覆核拖延港方動工興建港珠澳大橋.....等等等等。香港的勞工法(57章僱傭條例)除了第9節有關革職要有理據外,其它一切終止賓主關係的規定只涉及賠償或通知期是否根據僱傭合約或依法,卻並沒有規定要說明原因。狀棍黨內多名御用大狀又豈會不知?他們卻派員到商台大門參與示威,要商業電台解釋原因。在反動傳媒及政客眼中臭口棄婦應該有免死金牌,是否因為凡持反中亂港立場而任職傳媒者皆應有此待遇?
施永青先生近幾星期已在C觀點中多次闡釋所謂『編採自主』的謬誤。當一個傳媒老闆找到一個同聲同氣甚至肚裡條蟲做總編輯,自不然就100%編採自主。例如肥佬黎請到李怡做主筆,天作之合。但香港不少傳媒工作者卻幻想把所有傳媒機構統統變成香港電台,老闆出錢請一大班人對自己罵不停口,且打不還手。BBC雖然也有批評英國政府,但遠比不上作為英國喉舌批判中國的力度。美國的公營電視台更只是著重提高國民的通識。以公帑支付作為反對派喉舌,除了香港電台世界上相信再找不到第二家。現正在曾公信力第一報章上演的鬧劇,員工認為不能更換總編輯因新來者的價值觀『可能』與他們不同。試問有什麼公司的總經理的價值觀及處事方式是和老闆不同,而只要獲員工認可就能坐穩船?至於那名前總編輯是否該炒,看官可有留意早幾天由其現在負責之網站老屈無線『把港英旗放在香港冬奧代表名字後面』? 據云屈穎妍在其專欄中寫過肥佬黎也常以電話吩咐編輯部要怎樣怎樣做。立場與理念一致的只是督促,不盡相同的就變成干預。雙重標準。
在60年代政治動盪時期先父任職政治部,家裡訂閱左右報章五、六份,余從那時起養成讀報習慣及對時事的關注。其後70及80年代曾在西方多國求學及工作多年,包括英國3年、美國1年、加拿大半年及荷蘭半年,除了因不諳荷文,亦廣閱各國不同傳媒。遣詞用字的偏激與『突出』皆無出香港之右。但各地報章均是政治立場衝突的戰場。不同政見者擇木而棲,各為其主。香港現在一部分無冕皇帝則要喧賓奪主!在任何一個大都會,包括『紐倫港』排名在我們之上的紐約和倫敦,報章的數目均遠遠落於香港之後。百花齊放、百家爭鳴,香港雖有傳統報章執笠如華僑日報、天天日報,但亦有新出免費報章。再者,單憑過去十多年迄今香港電台及曾公信力第一報章的全球獨有情況,說香港新聞自由下降甚或有政客危言聳聽謂步入寒冬,簡直是有悖天理。更不要忘記香港還有由老黑經營的暢銷報章,尤其是所慣用標題之風格。
也來談一下反動政客憑藉炒作之所謂新聞自由度名單,排名比我們高的包括歐洲非常富裕超小型國家,人口分別不足4萬及8萬之LiechtensteinAndorra, 也有比他們人口多十倍,50萬人之Cape Verde及70多萬人之Comoros;亦有人口比香港多逾倍之Burkina Faso,但這國家之識字率僅得25%且人均國民生產總值每年不足港幣5,000元。更值得注意的是排名僅比我們高一位的Mauritania,請看看國際特赦組織Amnesty International對這國家的評語:“complete disregard for legal procedure, fair trial, or humane imprisonment”(即完全不理法治,對囚犯不人道)。你會相信哪一個機構所作的評估呢?
希望不是開心得太早甚或是空歡喜。有點擔心會過檔港台。吳志森亦曾是從清早噴戾氣改到黃昏,但現在仍主持頭條新聞,荼毒港人,特別是下一代!
後記:讓我答复一下部分同學的回應。Peter,這事件在勞工法的框架裡並不是Dismissal,而是終止僱傭合約。前者不能無理或不合理,後者即使是即時的只要符合合約內容或支付代通知金就可;而且是雙方面均如是,僱員即炒老闆魷魚尤為普遍。商台已在14號交代了理由:她在調離早晨節目後在其傍晚節目不停的罵雇主同時令到收聽率下降。她罵天罵地罵其他人罵了
9年,也由她,哪能說沒言論自由,罵老闆罵個不停是充分的死罪。除了香港電台,其他老闆哪有這麼海量? Prof Chee寫回應之後,她更變本加厲,16/2在城市論壇說“我是證人,我說的就是證據”。已儼然被泛民傳媒及政棍捧成民主女神的下一句名言可能是“我說的就是真理”。正如網上流傳,鄭大奸的電台一定與其天造地設。
各位看官,請不要錯過余各同學及各方好友的精闢回應(2頁)。 

迴響(16) :
16樓. cheungahshui
2014/08/25 17:59
哪有花钱请人骂自己的老板?

香港政府是也!

天天说香港的新闻自由进入寒冬,他们把67年的历史忘掉了。那时的“正午报“天天批评港英政府,卒之有一天,大批警察攻进去,封艇拉人!

新闻自由,今天比那时好多啦!

15樓. jwan
2014/02/26 18:27
沒有調查就沒有發言權
鄭經翰、李慧玲 provided some other facts in 風波裡的茶杯:

http://media.blubrry.com/d100_radio_hong_kong/archive.d100.net/download.php?file=02HKTeaCupNEWS/02-2014-02-17-96k.mp3&name=HKTeaCupNEWS-2014-02-17

1)尚未離職就傾準備過檔的事宜, 仲同大班錄埋音,有憑有據。D100 does not have money to hire her before she was fired.

2)收聽率不斷下降。More data are needed.沒有調查就沒有發言權

3)在節目中不停的鬧商台。Had been for 9.5 years, not only from last November.

Of course she is fired now because she did not resign last November. She had said she would stay until the last minute, which surprised 商台。

It was surprised that 商台 fired her in such an ugly way. They should have known that 李慧玲 is a public figure and this is a sensitive moment.

after receiving the above link, i tortured myself for more than 2 hours listening to that mad dog 鄭大奸. apparently, Li admitted that her relationship with CR had all along been good up to her transfer from am to pm. she'd truly been cursing for 9.5 years, but not at her employer. she bore grudge only at & after the said transfer. this corresponds completely with what GM/CR Ms Chan's statement to the press a couple of days after the firing.
moreover, CR is really a commercial enterprise, if the audience ratings of Li's evening program was not dropping, firing her may hv adverse effect on advertisement income.

zhangWL2014/02/26 19:10回覆
14樓. top dog
2014/02/26 17:56
mad house
Teacher swearing at cops; protesters calling chinese as 支那人; deluded shock jocks ranting that she's fired cos of cy leung's conspiracy. Has hong kong becomes a theatre of the absurd. get me out of this mad house.
13樓. Frankie
2014/02/26 12:58
good old days
It may not be fair for me to make the comments about HK since I’ve been away for so long. Even though I try to keep up, I still can’t feel the reality.
In my perspective, everything becomes conspiracy nowadays in HK. The media is exaggerating to the most for any single matter. HK government is not functioning properly. The “political” idols are making scenes to catch media attention. CY Leung is the worst politician and lack of public work experience. His subordinates are as bad or worse except those have public service background. The high price real estate strategy (the main income of the government) isn’t really working. A mediocre economy is adding oil to fire. The combination of all of above creates a unrest society and put it into a bad cycle. Everything is negative.
In today’s news, a public worker at Education Department is penalized and terminated because she used her influence to help a friend’s child to enroll in a particular school. It happened all day long in the past. Is it such a serious matter? Anyway, it wasn’t in the news ever when we were young – maybe naïve and innocent as quoted by Jiang.
I really enjoy the life in HK when we were young. “Politics” is only for the fun of a very small group of people. Government functioned well. People only pay attention to working hard for a better living. Comparatively there is not too much progress in life for HK, maybe materialistic improvement but really not life.
We called ourselves Chinese all the time when we were young but we told people that we are HKer when travelling overseas. HKer had no identity nor belonged to any country – not British nor Chinese even though we held a “British” passport. After 97, most HKer are at lost because we don’t know our identity. We remain as HKer.
Just to share some opinion from an overseas HKer.
12樓. dan doo
2014/02/25 15:17
On HK's Media
This is an excellent article & should be published in all newspaper in HK & in mainland(except Apple Daily).
11樓. stephen yuen
2014/02/17 14:43
nice
Georgeous view and excellent photography
10樓. Edmond
2014/02/16 15:21
3 points

商台解雇李慧玲,陳志雲13/2在其早晨節目上說漏了嘴,大概意思是說與數年前解雇鄭經瀚差不多;為求達到其各種包括商業的目的,商台真是古惑,什麼時候還會故技重施?

狀棍黨上次搞司法覆核拖延港方動工興建港珠澳大橋.延誤導致政府需要付承建商等數以億元計的賠償,狀棍黨某些人是否與這些賠償有關係,那就天曉得了?

施永青的AM730本來就沒有多少中資銀行等去落廣告,現在人家不要繼續被“揾笨”,就將人家的商業決定說成是政治原因。

9樓. Chee to P
2014/02/16 15:02
freedom of speech

I agree that she was being treated roughly and I don’t think she deserves that kind of treatment.  However, whatever sympathy I had for her quickly dissipated when I listened to her statements in the interview.  She was 100% sure that C. Y. Leung was behind her dismissal.  This really typifies her style – strong and loud statement without any proof.  Unfortunately this style is also shared by so many of these so call Pan-democrates. Is that freedom of speech? I don’t think so I would classify that as verbal abuse.  I would defend with my life the freedom of speech but don’t mix the two up.

8樓. P
2014/02/16 00:34
freedom of speech

Your blog your view.

Some agree some don't,

So better just read and

not making comment..

 

Wise not wise ah……ha ha

 

Agreed that she is not the key to affect renewal of the radio license.  But she did not deserve an immediate dismiss unless due to unknown violation of company rules, eg. bribery.

I would take serious thoughts about that ONE MALE selfish heart and obedient dog mind to the NORTH ADULT,....just like what HKTV ( Wong Wai Kee ) encountered in being disqualified in their application of TV license.....

These are my own views....yes I dislike the present government's moves / actions......shrinken our freedom and not giving out their hugh revenues, eg. Paying out hk$ 10,000 per year to each of us....just like Macau govt.....ha ha.

7樓. Tammy
2014/02/15 10:46
生活的學習過程

William:

拜讀你的文章,說得很對呀,代表著如我這類沉默市民.

現今的傳媒和政棍表現實在過份,縱容著某些人不斷造謠,歪言曲理,搧風點火,營造他們別有用心的社會氣氛,這一切,明顯地不是為香港好.

我們應該學習求知求真,明辨是非,不受蒙蔽,也是自我提升的一個方法.

發表迴響

會員登入