陳致中 has all the reason not going back to Taiwan. Why 陳致中 choose to take flight back?

• 1.陳致中夫婦是被輿論逼回來的,與「愛不愛台灣」無關.
  2.陳致中夫婦已被媒體描繪成生活豪奢的洗錢機器,傷害已經造成,為何回來?
  3.他回來，是要避免陳水扁在法律上成為「美國人的阿公?
  4.由於顧慮選情,他回來全力為北高選舉?
  5.陳水扁總統兒子陳致中夫婦在美國陸續傳出在當地置產，以及生活豪奢等傳言後，據了解,加州檢察官已經準備就是否觸犯美國洗錢防制法進行調查.
  6.為了解陳致中有無觸犯洗錢防制法, it is in the air that FBI might be asking the Judge to issue court order to search 陳致中 紐約住所 to collect evidence. 陳致中在紐約上西區的住宅　哈德遜河正對面　月租7100美元，終於確定是位於哥倫比亞大學附近的一棟高樓大廈. If 陳致中 really has to face agent, 陳致中 has to answer all the questions truthfully. To avoid the embarrassment, its
  good timing to go back to Taiwan. That might be the real
  reason to go back to Taiwan now?
  7.To escape the DHS FBI and IRS possible questioning?
  Particularly IRS, based on your tax return, they will
  schedual appointment for audit and question how come
  your income did not match your life style
  with $7,100 apartment rental. If you make
  an excuse for the money given by your parents, 
  then you have to present orignial documents to support
  your claim. If they find irregularity IRS will indict you for tax
  evasion.
• http://udn.com/NEWS/MEDIA/3631317-1518800.jpg
  Look at 陳致中's F-1 visa passport, it puzzled
  me a lots. It raised more questions than passport answered.
  Look at the entries recorded on the passport
  a. 4/10/2005 entry admitted.
  b. 5/11/2005 admitted
  c. 7/05/2005 admitted.
  d. 7/28/2005 admitted.
  e. 10/2/2005 admitted.
  f.  10/26/2006 admitted in NYC.
  Within a period of 2 years, 陳致中 had been
  in and out in the States for 7 times. F-1 visa usually is issued
  to a student. If I were FBI agent I would ask if 陳致中
  were in fact a student? What were those trips for? If he were a
  business man I can understand. Anyway it smells phishy.  I don't
  know if 陳致中 were given multipale entries or not.
• My response to CT blogging: 
  Do you know immigration department is under DHS?
  When if it involves criminal case, Bush already ordered both
  FBI and DHS to coodinate to conduct investigation.
  Look at the entry date carefully.
  4/11/2005
  5/11/2005 and then
  7/05/2005
  7/28/2005
  Does it ring a bell?
  It is apparent that each time he departed without going thru
  customs inspection. And if he arrived in U.S. also enjoyed
  Diplomatic privilege, you know what would happen?
  That is why they would invetigate the gape and leakage.
  If they find huge cash deposited to the bank at time
  closely matched the entry date. Bin-go. You hit the
  jacket pot. That is a scenario. I am just imagining things
  and not insinuating any thing.
• This is what anti-money laundering law says: 
  All NBFIs in the United States are required
  to obtain information about the true identity of a person
  on whose behalf an account is opened or when a transaction
  is conducted if it involves the receipt of currency or certain
  other monetary instruments over $10,000, the transfer of
  funds over $3,000, or the cross-border movement of
  currency or certain negotiable instruments over $10,000 
  In another words, you are required to open a/c in person and
  deposit money by your self and/or by other person w/ID.