I don't know why I link 馬總統&巴菲特 together.
There might be a good reason for this comparison of two
different people.I am talking about the position of 馬總統,
the head of ROC leading 23 million population while 巴菲特
is the richest people in the world, who is responsible for his
investor and helped his follower investor making 21% in
average annual earning  for more than 40 years.
Who is the people comparing the two most respectable and
lovable?
The answer is clear.
巴菲特!
Well, I asked myself why?
It looks like its apple and Orange since 馬總統 is a political
figure while 巴菲特 is a financial Tycoon. There is no
co-relationship between the two. I find the affirmative to
this answer. Both of 馬總統&巴菲特 are dealing directly
with People.
That is my whole point.
When 7,65 millions voters entrusted 馬總統 with confidence
they believe in what they can count on his leader ship for a
better life of their family in the days to come while the all
investor of 巴菲特 entrusted his wisdom to make a money
for the expectable and reasonable return.
I like what 巴菲特said to his CEO.他給這些總裁們的守則
只有以下兩條*
Rule number 1: do not lose any of your share holder's money. *
(**守則一** :**不要讓公司的投資人虧錢**)
* Rule number 2: Do not forget rule number 1.
*(**守則二** : **不要忘記守則一
When 馬總統 is elected he seemed forget what people entrusted
for. He started embracing other people who did not even voted him.
Its different mentality.
He forget the people entrusted him with "money" and expected
him to lead them to a better life.
That is the whole point of this article.
He, I mean 馬總統, can tell his CEO that all they have to do
is taking care of the people (investor) first. You just can't make
everybody happy.
There are 23 millions people out there and you just could not
cover every one of them. Besides, there is world population there,
too. Are you capable to take care all of the people in the world?