字體：小 中 大 |
|
|
|
| 2008/11/25 15:15:24 瀏覽849｜回應1｜推薦0 | |
|
1:00, so that a film I entangled. I would like to see an exciting action movie to pick-me-up, but did not. No live fire scenes, there is no ups and downs of the action, no spectacular special effects. In addition to the 30 suicide bombers outcome worthy of a clever, even the plot is also little suspense. Samir leading man behind the anti-bone is almost no cover. Even the major opponent all died as useless, did not show what a little talent-hung, was put up two shots bang. But I Xiangleyouxiang, or to the film four stars.
Perhaps because of this house there are many films made with the thinking of people. Does not matter who's in the detail, just like the night sky, stars of the sporadic, but hinted strongly divergent light. It is only when you are willing to embrace a religion to understand the mentality of an open, you can savor these few words between subtle. When the hunt is like Samir agents described him in the eyes of the terrorists, he said: Samir is a devout Muslim. And he sat across from his mother, said: No, he is a Muslim. Nothing more. In this front, do not need any description. This is the best Muslim decent, respectable man, is really the most religious understanding. This is not an artificial, not mystify, a well-layout, and the story of the film to promote fair and reasonable and, in many ways the United States to subvert the film's anti-terrorist movement. It is not always a pot of boiling water, not boiling intense, but warm feelings. In the past the United States and large areas of heroism, the terrorists there is less hideous, there is no longer looking forward to a good man is not on the face, is simply too broad and level-minded people with lofty ideals like heroes. Samir is not the actor but also as an education and to promote and create a hero, not the so-called heroic American citizen. He is not fighting for the United States, but for the heart of the fight of faith. I do not want to go into details about the American-style hero of the absurd, but also reluctant to talk about the hegemony of the ridiculous. American police complex in the world, need to reflect on their own. Omar said that like the terrorists: Americans have forgotten that they have in the eyes of the British people is a terrorist. When the self-proclaimed embodiment of justice for the U.S. Secret Service, said Carter: In order to win, have to make some sacrifices. Samir laughed. He asked: Do you know what you are saying look like? Samir was referring to Omar. The so-called truth and justice boundaries, fuzzy here. Carter's white face and the black-Omar, said this to me: ... ... victory is essential. The real necessary, perhaps to ask ourselves: What is the purpose of the original? In the search for the purpose of the process, those in their respective positions, are convinced of the correctness of their own, since it is not contrary to the original intention to review? I am wrong of me to speculate, there may be a lot of radical Americans, after watching the film director accused of any position. This is almost looks. In such a not so-called truth and justice as the film yard, not bad bad guys, good guys and good guys do not like. If this is a movie remake of mapping out the condition of our country, in a harmonious society would not necessarily be adopted by the review. This is the condition of our country under the Political Correctness (politically correct). And what is true and correct? - This is too numerous to record the ambitious proposition. If an American priest and not the human bomb explosion in a house to discuss the issue, they may quarrel on for three days and nights. If Carrefour smashed a patriotic youth and a Japanese militarists in a room to discuss the issue, they may Qiazhao both Xunqing the other side of the neck. Everyone has the right of everyone. Everyone adhere to everyone's right. Ah correct correct correct this thing is the pursuit of a better, but it is so that the world is full of disputes so that the world can not always stay away from war and displacement. Sometimes I even doubt that the pursuit of the right in the end is not correct. However, this could easily fall into nothingness. I just forced myself not to go too far on this idea. Perhaps that is the right not to go too far. Samir like to ask Carter: How far you want to go? Everyone wants to about Zoude Yuan, and would often go too far extreme. Therefore, people often need to stop and look at correcting the way, need to Wu Shen three days. I often find that their ideas are always close to the doctrine of the mean. Unfortunately, in the absence of the outside world in the light of the circumstances, I can not judge this is, after twists and turns of the Return to Innocence, or the Chinese Confucian education on the root cause of divergence in its role of the submarine. But in any case, whether for Huanglian or black-white face, the extreme is not good. "Overcome the temptation of the right to life, is the great jihad." Similarly Unfortunately, I am not ashamed of the faith. Is not the ultimate end-result and look up to. However, I insist on my own. I firmly believe that at least one point, whether Christian or Islamic, communist or Buddha is, there are always some things are the same, you can shake hands and make the. For example, drinking water is certainly the feces and can not eat, such as peace is good and violence is shameful, such as Allah said: If you kill an innocent people, it's as if you've killed all mankind. Truthfulness, benevolence, and the United States, these three words, whether they will be applied and how to use, but they should be all religions and to promote the initial intention. Back to the film, about its intention, that is, in a bland quietly ask you: What is your intention, but you do, then what is it? Of course, as a human bomb to stay away from the United States is also far from the Chinese people, I can fight across the concept of tiger. I would like to joking that if the Americans have heard of Omar so-called American-style justice irrefutable condemnation of what will become of them. I can also accused of grand and radical Muslim belief in the maintenance of the road but with the true meaning of different beliefs. However, such problems are most afraid backfire. Inter-trance when I do not care to ask ourselves, how can I be calm and Leila, Mianbugaise heart does not jump? Traitor probably used as a title, refers not only paved the way for the start Samir was mistaken for an American citizen of the traitors, not only refers to the truth surfaced after, Samir was the Muslims as traitors. Samir, as at the last minute of Omar said: those who act in the name of Allah, Muslims are the real traitor - this is beyond a religious right. Muslims that is the case, did not have freedom of religious belief of any faith is so. The reason why I like this "traitor" in the name of the film, because I think it goes beyond the false pseudo-mode kind of heroism, but also to explore religion, beyond the narrow religious. While I regret that it can not become a classic, it has a lot of points to the lack of intensity through a number of points, but the trigger thinking in this regard, yet it is still a good film. No position, it is precisely the position of the firm. And the original heart of the question, it is the greatest significance. Traitors do not mean a specific person, and every point to a specific person. Regardless of which side in the East, everyone can be a traitor. And the original intention was a traitor, traitor of the conscience is clean, is the betrayer of his own. Whether you or I, can not justify. The only self-help, that is jihad. "Overcome the temptation of the right to life." The great holy war will not happen in the soul-stirring, but can occur in the ordinary down-to-earth life. |
|
| ( 休閒生活｜影視戲劇 ) |
