Contents ...
udn網路城邦
老子哲學﹕清政簡刑﹐與民休息
2010/02/26 07:07
瀏覽802
迴響2
推薦1
引用0

在此一報導Campaign flashback: McCain clashes with Obama中﹐馬坎說得太棒了﹗但是了解得太晚﹐說得太遲啦﹗

是那句話呢﹖老美法令多如牛毛﹐通則之外﹐有例外﹐例外之外﹐又有特例﹔這常令人無所是從。

連德州縣政府官員是房屋管理基層機構都不知道﹐究竟棟民宅﹐因為欠繳田賦稅遭法拍﹐原房主可以有半年或二年的時間﹐贖回其屋註﹕老鄧的『一國兩制』算是頭腦簡單的東東﹔老美五十州﹐就至少有五十制﹐加州可沒有這個啥回贖期﹔所以加州人可別學老丏『不鳥』德州法律﹐那死得快。反之亦然﹐德州人可別對加州房客﹐搞啥切水斷電﹐那準有加州免費牢飯吃喔﹗

為免有法律之責﹐德州官員乾粹在法拍時﹐一律宣告一切財稅拍賣屋﹐統統有兩年贖回期﹐這明顯違反德州州憲的規定。蓋自用住宅是有兩年﹐其他產物﹐原則上(這句『原則』﹐就學很大)只有六個月﹐而自用與否﹐是不以屋宅有否設定“homestead”成為自用住宅為準﹐而是視情況由法庭決定之。伊娘列﹗這就要看法官及律師的心情﹔律師圈內﹐最根底的開玩笑說法是﹐一切決定於﹕法官昨夜能否睡在床上﹐沒被夫人踢下床囉﹗

甚至﹐主管財稅的國稅局﹐也宣稱其官員所作的回答﹐不可以做為抗辯的理由。換言之﹐老百姓不知如何處理﹐函請國稅局指示明路﹐據以報稅﹔事後卻被查帳﹐要受處罰﹐死老百姓不可拿那張國稅局公函說﹕『伊娘列﹐我不懂﹐所以照您們函示申報﹐卻又說我有罪﹐漏稅逃稅﹗顯然故意入人於罪﹐這太無理呦。』

嘿﹗國稅局不早就公告週知﹐說所有官方回覆都是參考﹐請老百姓一定要諮商自己的律師而後行﹐其官員非律師﹐不夠格作『法律建議』。您不花錢﹐找自己的律師﹑會計師﹐此乃刁民﹐咎由自取﹐責不在官哦﹗

所以啦﹗法令多而雜﹐互相又有矛盾﹐產生不明確的狀態或不穩定秩序﹐是謂政令不明﹐政治難以清明。弄得昏天又暗地﹐黑白難分而有灰﹐孰令致之﹖當然﹐是幹法律這一行的眾精英。

不如此﹐則水清無魚。那來的混水好摸魚﹖那會有廣大需求﹖那來的大筆錢賺﹖難怪近日老美失業率高漲至十二趴(有謂加州已達二十趴)﹐但法律人這行﹐失業率只有一趴。唉﹐國力浪費在訟庭上﹐可惜哉﹗

看懂太公胡說啥嗎﹖知道是指馬坎的那一句話嗎﹖

Campaign flashback: McCain clashes with Obama

WASHINGTON – Who said the 2008 presidential campaign was over? President Barack Obama upbraided his former Republican rival, Sen. John McCain, on Thursday for resorting to political "talking points" at a health care summit Obama organized in hopes of bridging the divide between the two parties.

After McCain used his time to complain that Obama reneged on a campaign promise to bring "change in Washington," the president bluntly told the Arizona Republican that "we're not campaigning any more. The election is over."

McCain retorted that he's "reminded of that every day."

Nearly two years after his defeat, McCain is facing a primary challenge from the right in his bid for a fifth Senate term. Former Rep. J.D. Hayworth, a conservative who hosted a radio talk show, is challenging the 73-year-old incumbent, who has an uneasy relationship with his party's right.

McCain has been displaying his Republican credentials, railing against Democrats for finalizing health care legislation behind closed doors despite Obama's promise of transparency for health care negotiations.

He also derides special deals in the health care bill to benefit people, and the lawmakers who represent them, in Nebraska, Louisiana, Connecticut and Florida.

"I hope that that would be an argument for us to go through this 2,400-page document, remove all the special deals for the special interests and favored few, and treat all Americans the same under provisions of the law, so that they will know that geography does not dictate what kind of health care they would receive," McCain told Obama.

McCain said Obama promised better governance during the campaign "and what we got was a process you and I both said we would change in Washington."

During the summit's afternoon session, Obama and McCain had a more good-natured exchange.

McCain criticized a provision of the Senate bill that spared 800,000 seniors in Florida from benefit cuts in the Medicare Advantage program, the private insurance under the umbrella of the government program.

"Why should we carve out 800,000?" McCain asked.

"I think you make a legitimate point," Obama responded to a surprised McCain.

"Thank you very much," McCain said, amid smiles and laughter.

有誰推薦more
全站分類:時事評論 財經
自訂分類:不分類
上一則: 這叫放屁﹗
下一則: No Kidding? What a great government for us!

限會員,要發表迴響,請先登入
迴響(2) :
2樓.
2010/02/26 14:33
That was a good pun.
如上

Are you sure是pun非笨﹖

Well﹐there may be a typo。 Hope your “pun” is “fun”﹐

爽就好啦﹗別太苛求﹐讓人說您 hard to please。

曾太公2010/02/27 03:19回覆
1樓.
2010/02/26 09:36
Answer?
No fun, you highlighted it already. 

America's problem: special interest, special interest, special interest. 

Sorry, not everyone is so smart, knowledgeable as you are.  It is my fault to treat everyone the same.

I am truly sorry to forget how smart my reader is  Never treat you guys like those dummy. 

Glad to find out that my readers are not that dumb as others' so that I will hide my thought more carefully from now on, in order to further exchange viewpoints among us.

p.s. No highlight now.

曾太公2010/02/26 09:53回覆